ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2017
On the relevance of surrogate parameter deduction in biomedical research: mediated regression analysis for variance explanation of cervical range of motion.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unilateral and bilateral training competitive archers differ in some potentially unhealthy neck-shoulder region movement behaviour characteristics.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Prospective surgical solutions in degenerative spine: spinal simulation for optimal choice of implant and targeted device development.Innovative surgical sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeResearch on cervical range of motion (ROM) often includes age and body mass index (BMI) as potential variables to explain inter-individual variances. The BMI may not be a predictor of ROM but an age-affected surrogate parameter: the described effect of BMI on ROM is, thus, suspected being partially or completely mediated by age.
methodsHealthy and adult volunteers (n = 139, 65 female, age 19-75 years, BMI 24.2 ± 3.8 kg m
resultsAnalysis including all subjects revealed both a direct (-1.1, s
conclusionsAfter the withdrawal of the surrogate parameter BMI, age explains 53 % of maximal ROM. No impact of BMI on ROM was detected after excluding highly obese participants. Our results illustrate the relevance of including each supposable predictor in causal mediation models development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27324088What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.