Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27323902›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

A phase I followed by a randomized phase II trial of two cycles carboplatin-olaparib followed by olaparib monotherapy versus capecitabine in BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer as first line treatment (REVIVAL): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Philip C Schouten, Gwen M H E Dackus, Serena Marchetti, Harm van Tinteren, Gabe S Sonke, Jan H M Schellens, Sabine C Linn

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02418624 (A Phase I Followed by a Randomized Phase II Trial of Two Cycles Carboplatin-Olaparib Followed by Olaparib Monotherapy Versus Capecitabine in BRCA-1 or -2 Mutated Her2 Negative Advanced Breast Cancer as First Line Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02418624 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase I Followed by a Randomized Phase II Trial of Two Cycles Carboplatin-Olaparib Followed by Olaparib Monotherapy Versus Capecitabine in BRCA-1 or -2 Mutated Her2 Negative Advanced Breast Cancer as First Line Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteRan2015 to 2019Enrolled25ConditionsBreast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Advanced CancerArmscarboplatin, olaparib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DNA Damage Repair Inhibitor for Breast Cancer Treatment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Philip C SchoutenDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gwen M H E DackusDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Serena MarchettiDivision of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Harm van TinterenDepartment of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gabe S SonkeDivision of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan H M SchellensDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sabine C LinnDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.linn@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUtrecht University · NLNetherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital · NLUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical studies in breast cancer models showed that BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficient cell lines, when compared to BRCA proficient cell lines, are extremely sensitive to PARP1 inhibition. When combining the PARP1 inhibitor olaparib with cisplatin in a BRCA1-mutated breast cancer mouse model, the combination induced a larger response than either of the two compounds alone. Several clinical studies have investigated single agent therapy or combinations of both drugs, but no randomized clinical evidence exists for the superiority of carboplatin-olaparib versus standard of care therapy in patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2--mutated metastatic breast cancer. METHODS/

designThis investigator-initiated study contains two parts. Part 1 is a traditional 3 + 3 dose escalation study of the carboplatin-olaparib combination followed by olaparib monotherapy. The carboplatin dose will be escalated from area under the curve (AUC) 3 to AUC 4 with an olaparib dose of 25 mg BID. Olaparib is subsequently escalated to 50, 75, and 100 mg BID until >1/6 of patients develop dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The dose level below will be the maximum tolerable dose (MTD). It is expected that 15-20 patients are needed in Part I. In Part 2 BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated HER2-negative breast cancer patients will be randomized between standard capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) BID day 1-14 q day 22, versus 2 cycles carboplatin-olaparib followed by olaparib monotherapy 300 mg BID. In total 104 events in 110 patients need to be observed to detect a 75 % clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), from a median of 4 months (control) to 7 months (experimental) assuming a 2-year accrual and ≥6 months of follow-up with 80 % power (5 %, two-sided significance level). After progression on first line treatment, patients will receive physician's best choice of paclitaxel, vinorelbine, eribulin, or capecitabine (experimental arm only) at standard dose. A compassionate use program of olaparib is available for patients in the standard arm after progression on second line treatment. DISCUSSION: Results might be pivotal for registration of olaparib as standard first line treatment in advanced BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated breast cancer.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02418624 . Registered on 9 March 2015. EudraCT number: 2013-005590-41. Registered on 15 October 2014. Protocol version 3.0.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMutationAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCapecitabineCarboplatinClinical ProtocolsCompassionate Use TrialsDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDrug Dosage CalculationsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCapecitabineCarboplatinERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesBRCA1BRCA2Breast cancerCapecitabineCarboplatinHomologous recombination deficiencyMetastaticOlaparibPARP inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID27323902
PMCPMC4915081
OpenAlexW2464512865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.