Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27323811›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2016

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis.

Bin Yang, Lin Jia, Qiaojuan Guo, Hui Ren, Yanping Hu, Tao Xie

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Therapeutic targeting of COX-2 in head and neck cancer: Mechanistic and clinical perspectives.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. IL-1/IL-1R Signaling in Head and Neck Cancer.Frontiers in oral health · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Role of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Head and Neck Tumorigenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Prostaglandin ECancer science · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bin YangDepartment of Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China.
Lin JiaDepartment of Nephrology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Wuhan, Hubei 430014, China.
Qiaojuan GuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital, Provincial Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350000, China.
Hui RenDepartment of Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China.
Yanping HuDepartment of Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China.
Tao XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China.
Hubei Cancer Hospital · CNCentral Hospital of Wuhan · CNFujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have assessed the clinicopathological and prognostic value of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), but their results remain controversial. To address this issue, a meta-analysis was carried out. A total of 29 studies involving 2430 patients were subjected to final analysis. Our results indicated that COX-2 expression was not statistically associated with advanced tumor stage (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.98-1.55) but correlated with high risk of lymph node metastasis (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.03-1.60) and advanced TNM stage (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.66). Moreover, COX-2 expression had significant effect on poor OS (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.29-2.90), RFS (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.00-4.08) and DFS (HR, 5.14; 95% CI, 2.84-9.31). The results of subgroup analyses revealed that COX-2 expression was related with high possibility of lymph node metastasis in oral cancer (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01-2.20) and advanced TNM stage in oral cancer (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.05-2.37) and no site-specific HNC (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.02-2.62). However, subgroup analyses only showed a tendency without statistically significant association between COX-2 expression and survival. Significant heterogeneity was not found when analyzing clinicopathological data, but it appeared when considering survival data. No publication bias was detected in this study. This meta-analysis suggested that COX-2 expression could act as a prognostic factor for patients with HNC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCyclooxygenase 2Head and Neck NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorCyclooxygenase 2PTGS2 protein, humanbiomarkercyclooxygenase-2head and neck cancermeta-analysisprognosis

Identifiers

PMID27323811
PMCPMC5216940
OpenAlexW2442223293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.