Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27323754›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2016

Open source deformable image registration system for treatment planning and recurrence CT scans : Validation in the head and neck region.

Ruta Zukauskaite, Carsten Brink, Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders Bertelsen, Jørgen Johansen, Cai Grau, Jesper Grau Eriksen

Abstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Automatic image segmentation based on synthetic tissue model for delineating organs at risk in spinal metastasis treatment planning.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruta ZukauskaiteInstitute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. ruta.zukauskaite@rsyd.dk.
Carsten BrinkInstitute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Christian Rønn HansenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Anders BertelsenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jørgen JohansenDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, C 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Cai GrauDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jesper Grau EriksenDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, C 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Odense University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical application of deformable registration (DIR) of medical images remains limited due to sparse validation of DIR methods in specific situations, e. g. in case of cancer recurrences. In this study the accuracy of DIR for registration of planning CT (pCT) and recurrence CT (rCT) images of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients was evaluated. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients treated with definitive IMRT for HNSCC in 2010-2012 were included. For each patient, a pCT and an rCT scan were used. Median interval between the scans was 8.5 months. One observer manually contoured eight anatomical regions-of-interest (ROI) twice on pCT and once on rCT.

methodspCT and rCT images were deformably registered using the open source software elastix. Mean surface distance (MSD) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) between contours were used for validation of DIR. A measure for delineation uncertainty was estimated by assessing MSD from the re-delineations of the same ROI on pCT. DIR and manual contouring uncertainties were correlated with tissue volume and rigidity.

resultsMSD varied 1-3 mm for different ROIs for DIR and 1-1.5 mm for re-delineated ROIs performed on pCT. DSC for DIR varied between 0.58 and 0.79 for soft tissues and was 0.79 or higher for bony structures, and correlated with the volumes of ROIs (r = 0.5, p < 0.001) and tissue rigidity (r = 0.54, p < 0.001).

conclusionDIR using elastix in HNSCC on planning and recurrence CT scans is feasible; an uncertainty of the method is close to the voxel size length of the planning CT images.

Indexed as

Subtraction TechniqueCarcinoma, Squamous CellDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityComputed tomographyelastixhead and neckValidation

Identifiers

PMID27323754
OpenAlexW2469064806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.