ReviewBone marrow transplantation2016
Life after transplant: are we becoming high maintenance in AML?
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- MRD-directed and risk-adapted individualized stratified treatment of AML.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- The Hematology of Tomorrow Is Here-Preclinical Models Are Not: Cell Therapy for Hematological Malignancies.Cancers · 2022Review
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network State of the Science Symposium 2021: Looking Forward as the Network Celebrates its 20th Year.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2021Review
- Current status and future clinical directions in the prevention and treatment of relapse following hematopoietic transplantation for acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia.Bone marrow transplantation · 2019Review
- Long term survival among patients who are disease free at 1-year post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a single center analysis of 389 consecutive patients.Bone marrow transplantation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for patients with AML is increasingly able to impact the historically poor outcomes in this disease. Nonetheless, even with transplant, the rates of post-HCT relapse are unacceptably high, and remain a great challenge in the treatment of patients with AML. Maintenance therapies after allo-HCT, given to patients at high risk of relapse or with evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD), may provide a way to reduce relapse rates and improve survival. New therapies may offer acceptable toxicity profiles in the post-HCT setting, and investigations are ongoing using hypomethylating agents, histone deacetylase inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, drug-antibody conjugates and cellular therapies. Future directions in the field of post-HCT therapies may include better risk stratification with MRD, as well as the exploitation of novel mechanisms such as immune checkpoint inhibition and modified chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. In this mini review, we discuss the current landscape of clinical research in post-HCT maintenance therapies, as well as future therapeutic strategies of interest. Although there is great potential for post-HCT agents to improve AML outcomes, these will need to be evaluated prospectively through well-designed randomized clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.