Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27322835›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016

Rotavirus vaccination and intussusception - Science, surveillance, and safety: A review of evidence and recommendations for future research priorities in low and middle income countries.

Catherine Yen, Kelly Healy, Jacqueline E Tate, Umesh D Parashar, Julie Bines, Kathleen Neuzil, Mathuram Santosham, A Duncan Steele

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Rotavirus vaccines: progress and new developments.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine Yena Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Kelly Healyb Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Jacqueline E Tatea Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Umesh D Parashara Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Julie Binesc Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The University of Melbourne , Victoria , Australia.
Kathleen Neuzild University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.
Mathuram Santoshamb Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , MD , USA.
A Duncan Steelee Enteric and Diarrhoeal Diseases, Global Health, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , Seattle , WA , USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USJohns Hopkins University · USBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As of January 2016, 80 countries have introduced rotavirus vaccines into their national immunization programs. Many have documented significant declines in rotavirus-specific and all-cause diarrheal illnesses following vaccine introduction. Two globally licensed rotavirus vaccines have been associated with a low risk of intussusception in several studies. In July 2014, the Rotavirus Organization of Technical Allies Council convened a meeting of research and advocacy organizations, public health experts, funders, and vaccine manufacturers to discuss post-marketing intussusception surveillance and rotavirus vaccine impact data. Meeting objectives were to evaluate updated data, identify and prioritize research gaps, discuss best practices for intussusception monitoring in lower-income settings and risk communication, and provide insight to country-level stakeholders on best practices for intussusception monitoring and communication. Meeting participants agreed with statements from expert bodies that the benefits of vaccination with currently available rotavirus vaccines outweigh the low risk of vaccination-associated intussusception. However, further research is needed to better understand the relationship of intussusception to wild-type rotavirus and rotavirus vaccines and delineate potential etiologies and mechanisms of intussusception. Additionally, evidence from research and post-licensure evaluations should be presented with evidence of the benefits of vaccination to best inform policymakers deciding on vaccine introduction or vaccination program sustainability.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHumansIntussusceptionProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingResearchRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesRotavirus Vaccinesinfantsintussusceptionrotavirusrotavirus vaccinevaccine

Identifiers

PMID27322835
PMCPMC5084992
OpenAlexW2471260831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.