Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27322643›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Client Factors Affect Provider Adherence to Clinical Guidelines during First Antenatal Care.

Mary Amoakoh-Coleman, Irene Akua Agyepong, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff, Gbenga A Kayode, Diederick E Grobbee, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, Evelyn K Ansah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary Amoakoh-ColemanJulius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0320-0396
Irene Akua AgyepongSchool of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Nicolaas P A ZuithoffJulius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gbenga A KayodeJulius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Diederick E GrobbeeJulius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kerstin Klipstein-GrobuschJulius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Evelyn K AnsahResearch and Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

Stroke and Cardiovascular Research Training (SCaRT) InstituteD43TW009140 · FIC · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ADANU, RICHARD M K, ALABI, SULYMAN BIODUN · 2011 to 2023
$2.5M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe first antenatal clinic (ANC) visit helps to distinguish pregnant women who require standard care, from those with specific problems and so require special attention. There are protocols to guide care providers to provide optimal care to women during ANC. Our objectives were to determine the level of provider adherence to first antenatal visit guidelines in the Safe Motherhood Protocol (SMP), and assess patient factors that determine complete provider adherence.

methodsThis cross-sectional study is part of a cohort study that recruited women who delivered in eleven health facilities and who had utilized antenatal care services during their pregnancy in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. A record review of the first antenatal visit of participants was carried out to assess the level of adherence to the SMP, using a thirteen-point checklist. Information on their socio-demographic characteristics and previous pregnancy history was collected using a questionnaire. Percentages of adherence levels and baseline characteristics were estimated and cluster-adjusted odds ratios (OR) calculated to identify determinants.

resultsA total of 948 women who had delivered in eleven public facilities were recruited with a mean age (SD) of 28.2 (5.4) years. Overall, complete adherence to guidelines pertained to only 48.1% of pregnant women. Providers were significantly more likely to completely adhere to guidelines when caring for multiparous women [OR = 5.43 (1.69-17.44), p<0.01] but less likely to do so when attending to women with history of previous pregnancy complications [OR = 0.50 (0.33-0.75), p<0.01].

conclusionComplete provider adherence to first antenatal visit guidelines is low across different facility types in the Greater Accra region of Ghana and is determined by parity and history of previous pregnancy complication. Providers should be trained and supported to adhere to the guidelines during provision of care to all pregnant women.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceGuidelines as TopicPatientsPrenatal CareAdultDemographyFemaleHumansOdds RatioPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID27322643
PMCPMC4913935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.