ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Roles for Coincidence Detection in Coding Amplitude-Modulated Sounds.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational Model for Synthesizing Auditory Brainstem Responses to Assess Neuronal Alterations in Aging and Autistic Animal Models.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Lateralization with varying envelope shape and spectral mismatch.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Precise spike-timing information in the brainstem is well aligned with the needs of communication and the perception of environmental sounds.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Pulse timing dominates binaural hearing with cochlear implants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Article
- Sound processing in the cricket brain: evidence for a pulse duration filter.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Interaural frequency mismatch jointly modulates neural brainstem binaural interaction and behavioral interaural time difference sensitivity in humans.Hearing research · 2023Article
- The continued importance of comparative auditory research to modern scientific discovery.Hearing research · 2023Review
- Interaural time difference sensitivity under binaural cochlear implant stimulation persists at high pulse rates up to 900 pps.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Simulation of ITD-Dependent Single-Neuron Responses Under Electrical Stimulation and with Amplitude-Modulated Acoustic Stimuli.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Temporal hyper-precision of brainstem neurons alters spatial sensitivity of binaural auditory processing with cochlear implants.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Robustness of neuronal tuning to binaural sound localization cues against age-related loss of inhibitory synaptic inputs.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Neuronal population model of globular bushy cells covering unit-to-unit variability.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Between-ear sound frequency disparity modulates a brain stem biomarker of binaural hearing.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Temporal dynamics and uncertainty in binaural hearing revealed by anticipatory eye movements.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Across Species "Natural Ablation" Reveals the Brainstem Source of a Noninvasive Biomarker of Binaural Hearing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Article
- Precisely timed inhibition facilitates action potential firing for spatial coding in the auditory brainstem.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Methods for identification of spike patterns in massively parallel spike trains.Biological cybernetics · 2018Article
- Physiological models of the lateral superior olive.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Many sensory neurons encode temporal information by detecting coincident arrivals of synaptic inputs. In the mammalian auditory brainstem, binaural neurons of the medial superior olive (MSO) are known to act as coincidence detectors, whereas in the lateral superior olive (LSO) roles of coincidence detection have remained unclear. LSO neurons receive excitatory and inhibitory inputs driven by ipsilateral and contralateral acoustic stimuli, respectively, and vary their output spike rates according to interaural level differences. In addition, LSO neurons are also sensitive to binaural phase differences of low-frequency tones and envelopes of amplitude-modulated (AM) sounds. Previous physiological recordings in vivo found considerable variations in monaural AM-tuning across neurons. To investigate the underlying mechanisms of the observed temporal tuning properties of LSO and their sources of variability, we used a simple coincidence counting model and examined how specific parameters of coincidence detection affect monaural and binaural AM coding. Spike rates and phase-locking of evoked excitatory and spontaneous inhibitory inputs had only minor effects on LSO output to monaural AM inputs. In contrast, the coincidence threshold of the model neuron affected both the overall spike rates and the half-peak positions of the AM-tuning curve, whereas the width of the coincidence window merely influenced the output spike rates. The duration of the refractory period affected only the low-frequency portion of the monaural AM-tuning curve. Unlike monaural AM coding, temporal factors, such as the coincidence window and the effective duration of inhibition, played a major role in determining the trough positions of simulated binaural phase-response curves. In addition, empirically-observed level-dependence of binaural phase-coding was reproduced in the framework of our minimalistic coincidence counting model. These modeling results suggest that coincidence detection of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs is essential for LSO neurons to encode both monaural and binaural AM sounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.