Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27322473›Full record

Observational studyEBioMedicine2016

A Molecular Signature of Myalgia in Myotonic Dystrophy 2.

Rabih Moshourab, Vinko Palada, Stefanie Grunwald, Ulrike Grieben, Gary R Lewin, Simone Spuler

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in EBioMedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Myotonic dystrophy type 2: the 2020 update.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Myotonic dystrophy type 2 and modifier genes: an update on clinical and pathomolecular aspects.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rabih MoshourabMolecular Physiology of Somatic Sensation, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany; Dept. of Anesthesiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Vinko PaladaMuscle Research Unit, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint cooperation of the Charité University Medicine Berlin and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Stefanie GrunwaldMuscle Research Unit, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint cooperation of the Charité University Medicine Berlin and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike GriebenMuscle Research Unit, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint cooperation of the Charité University Medicine Berlin and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Gary R LewinMolecular Physiology of Somatic Sensation, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: glewin@mdc-berlin.de.
Simone SpulerMuscle Research Unit, Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint cooperation of the Charité University Medicine Berlin and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: simone.spuler@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic muscle pain affects close to 20% of the population and is a major health burden. The underlying mechanisms of muscle pain are difficult to investigate as pain presents in patients with very diverse histories. Treatment options are therefore limited and not tailored to underlying mechanisms. To gain insight into the pathophysiology of myalgia we investigated a homogeneous group of patients suffering from myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2), a monogenic disorder presenting with myalgia in at least 50% of affected patients.

methodsAfter IRB approval we performed an observational cross-sectional cohort study and recruited 42 patients with genetically confirmed DM2 plus 20 healthy age and gender matched control subjects. All participants were subjected to an extensive sensory-testing protocol. In addition, RNA sequencing was performed from 12 muscle biopsy specimens obtained from DM2 patients.

findingsClinical sensory testing as well as RNA sequencing clearly separated DM2 myalgic from non-myalgia patients and also from healthy controls. In particular pressure pain thresholds were significantly lowered for all muscles tested in myalgic DM2 patients but were not significantly different between non-myalgic patients and healthy controls. The expression of fourteen muscle expressed genes in myalgic patients was significantly up or down-regulated in myalgic compared to non-myalgic DM2 patients.

interpretationOur data support the idea that molecular changes in the muscles of DM2 patients are associated with muscle pain. Further studies should address whether muscle-specific molecular pathways play a significant role in myalgia in order to facilitate the development of mechanism-based therapeutic strategies to treat musculoskeletal pain.

fundingThis study was funded by the German Research Society (DFG, GK1631), KAP programme of Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyalgiaMyotonic DystrophyPain ThresholdSequence Analysis, RNAMAO B inhibitorMyalgiaMyotonic dystrophy 2Pressure pain thresholdQuantitative sensory testingRNA Seq

Identifiers

PMID27322473
PMCPMC4909324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.