Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27322313›Full record

ArticleNutrients2016

The Tanita SC-240 to Assess Body Composition in Pre-School Children: An Evaluation against the Three Component Model.

Christine Delisle Nyström, Pontus Henriksson, Christina Alexandrou, Marie Löf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine Delisle NyströmDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, 141 83 Huddinge, Sweden. christine.delisle.nystrom@ki.se.
Pontus HenrikssonPROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity Research Group (PROFITH), 18071 Granada, Spain. pontus.tm.henriksson@gmail.com.
Christina AlexandrouDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, 141 83 Huddinge, Sweden. alexandrou81@gmail.com.
Marie LöfDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, 141 83 Huddinge, Sweden. marie.lof@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quick, easy-to-use, and valid body composition measurement options for young children are needed. Therefore, we evaluated the ability of the bioelectrical impedance (BIA) device, Tanita SC-240, to measure fat mass (FM), fat free mass (FFM) and body fatness (BF%) in 40 healthy, Swedish 5.5 years old children against the three component model (3C model). Average BF%, FM, and FFM for BIA were: 19.4% ± 3.9%, 4.1 ± 1.9 kg, and 16.4 ± 2.4 kg and were all significantly different (p < 0.001) from corresponding values for the 3C model (25.1% ± 5.5%, 5.3 ± 2.5 kg, and 15.2 ± 2.0 kg). Bland and Altman plots had wide limits of agreement for all body composition variables. Significant correlations ranging from 0.81 to 0.96 (p < 0.001) were found for BF%, FM, and FFM between BIA and the 3C model. When dividing the children into tertiles for BF%, 60% of children were classified correctly by means of BIA. In conclusion, the Tanita SC-240 underestimated BF% in comparison to the 3C model and had wide limits of agreement. Further work is needed in order to find accurate and easy-to-use methods for assessing body composition in pre-school children.

Indexed as

Body CompositionElectrical Equipment and SuppliesElectric ImpedanceAdipose TissueBody Mass IndexChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSwedenWhite Peoplebioelectrical impedancepre-schoolTanita SC-240three component model

Identifiers

PMID27322313
PMCPMC4924212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.