Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27322143›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Comparison of small biopsy specimens and surgical specimens for the detection of EGFR mutations and EML4-ALK in non-small-cell lung cancer.

DeSheng Xiao, Can Lu, Wei Zhu, QiuYan He, Yong Li, ChunYan Fu, JianHua Zhou, Shuang Liu, YongGuang Tao

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

DeSheng XiaoDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China.
Can LuDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China.
Wei ZhuDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China.
QiuYan HeDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China.
Yong LiDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China.
ChunYan FuDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China.
JianHua ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China.
Shuang LiuCenter for Medicine Research, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
YongGuang TaoCancer Research Institute, School of Basic Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410078, China.
Xiangya Hospital Central South University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion genes represent novel oncogenes that are associated with non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). The feasibility of detecting EGFR mutations and ALK fusion genes in small biopsy specimens or surgical specimens was determined. Of the 721 NSCLC patients, a total of 305 cases were positive for EGFR mutations (42.3%). The rate of EGFR mutations in women was significantly higher than that in men. Histologically, the EGFR mutation rate in adenocarcinomas was significantly higher than that in squamous cell carcinomas. No difference in the EGFR mutation rate was observed between surgical specimens (42.1%) and small biopsy specimens (42.4%), which indicated that the EGFR mutation ratios in surgical specimens and small biopsy specimens were not different. In 385 NSCLC patients, 26 cases were positive for EML4-ALK (6.8%). However, 11.7% of the surgical specimens were EML4-ALK-positive, whereas the positive proportion in the small biopsy specimens was only 4.7%, which indicated that EML4-ALK-positive rate in the surgical specimens was significantly higher than that in the small biopsy specimens. Detection of EGFR gene mutations was feasible in small biopsy specimens, and screening for EML4-ALK expression in small biopsy specimens can be used to guide clinical treatments.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationOncogene Proteins, FusionYoung AdultEGFR protein, humanEML4-ALK fusion protein, humanErbB ReceptorsOncogene Proteins, FusionEGFREML4-ALKnon-small-cell lung carcinomasmall biopsy specimenssurgical specimens

Identifiers

PMID27322143
PMCPMC5312294
OpenAlexW2437375877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.