Observational studyJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2016
Discussions About Driving Between Older Adults and Primary Care Providers.
Observational study in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Driving behavior and driving outcomes after acute and critical illness: A systematic review.International journal of nursing studies · 2025Pooled it
- "Is it time to stop driving?": A randomized clinical trial of an online decision aid for older drivers.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Trial
- Reliability and validity of The Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition short form.The Gerontologist · 2025Article
- "You just have to be careful how you do it": A qualitative study of the Healthwise decision aid for older drivers.Traffic injury prevention · 2024Article
- Medications and traffic accidents involving older drivers: do Spanish primary healthcare physicians know enough?BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Driving decisions after critical illness: Qualitative analysis of patient-provider reviews during ICU recovery clinic assessments.International journal of nursing studies · 2023Article
- Older adults and planning for firearm safety: A qualitative study of healthcare providers.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- Prevention of road crashes in older adults: perspectives on facilitators, barriers and the role of the family doctor.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- The Advancing Understanding of Transportation Options (AUTO) study: design and methods of a multi-center study of decision aid for older drivers.Injury epidemiology · 2021Article
- Physician and Family Discussions about Driving Safety: Findings from the LongROAD Study.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo estimate how many older adults discuss driving with a primary care provider during a calendar year and to describe discussion triggers.
designObservational retrospective medical record review.
settingThree primary care clinics (geriatric, hospital-based general internal medicine (GIM), community-based GIM) affiliated with a tertiary care hospital.
participantsRandom sample of 240 older (aged ≥65) adults with one or more primary care visits in 2014 (January 1 to December 31). MEASUREMENTS: Standardized chart abstraction of participant demographic characteristics, medical diagnoses, and presence and context of discussions about driving. Provider factors (obtained from clinic administrators) included sex and average amount worked per week.
resultsParticipants who visited the geriatric clinic were oldest, had more medical diagnoses, and had a median of 4 visits in 2014 (vs 3 visits in GIM clinics). Documented discussions about driving occurred with a greater proportion of participants in the geriatric (n = 22, 28%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 18-39%) and GIM hospital (n = 15, 19%, 95% CI = 11-29%) clinics than the GIM community clinic (n = 6, 7.5%, 95% CI = 2.8-16%). Medical diagnoses that might affect driving were prevalent but not associated with frequency of documented discussions. In multivariable analysis, participants were more likely to have one or more documented driving discussions in 2014 if they went to the geriatric clinic or had a primary care provider younger than 45 or who worked fewer than six half-day clinics per week.
conclusionOver 1 year, a minority of older adults had a documented discussion about driving with a primary care provider, with differences according to clinic and provider characteristics. Strategies to support routine and preparatory conversations about driving should incorporate these findings and might vary among clinic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.