Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27321612›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2016

Discussions About Driving Between Older Adults and Primary Care Providers.

Marian E Betz, Halinganji Kanani, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Robert Schwartz

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marian E BetzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Halinganji KananiSchool of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Elizabeth Juarez-ColungaDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Robert SchwartzDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
Physician Screening of Older Drivers: Decision Rules for Geriatric Injury PreventK23AG043123 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BETZ, MARIAN ELIZABETH · 2013 to 2017
$915k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NIA NIH HHS K23 AG043123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate how many older adults discuss driving with a primary care provider during a calendar year and to describe discussion triggers.

designObservational retrospective medical record review.

settingThree primary care clinics (geriatric, hospital-based general internal medicine (GIM), community-based GIM) affiliated with a tertiary care hospital.

participantsRandom sample of 240 older (aged ≥65) adults with one or more primary care visits in 2014 (January 1 to December 31). MEASUREMENTS: Standardized chart abstraction of participant demographic characteristics, medical diagnoses, and presence and context of discussions about driving. Provider factors (obtained from clinic administrators) included sex and average amount worked per week.

resultsParticipants who visited the geriatric clinic were oldest, had more medical diagnoses, and had a median of 4 visits in 2014 (vs 3 visits in GIM clinics). Documented discussions about driving occurred with a greater proportion of participants in the geriatric (n = 22, 28%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 18-39%) and GIM hospital (n = 15, 19%, 95% CI = 11-29%) clinics than the GIM community clinic (n = 6, 7.5%, 95% CI = 2.8-16%). Medical diagnoses that might affect driving were prevalent but not associated with frequency of documented discussions. In multivariable analysis, participants were more likely to have one or more documented driving discussions in 2014 if they went to the geriatric clinic or had a primary care provider younger than 45 or who worked fewer than six half-day clinics per week.

conclusionOver 1 year, a minority of older adults had a documented discussion about driving with a primary care provider, with differences according to clinic and provider characteristics. Strategies to support routine and preparatory conversations about driving should incorporate these findings and might vary among clinic settings.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleRetrospective Studiesautomobile drivingolder adultphysician-patient relationspreventive health serviceswomen physicians

Identifiers

PMID27321612
PMCPMC4916846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.