Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27321574›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunology2016

New milestones ahead in complement-targeted therapy.

Daniel Ricklin, John D Lambris

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Kidney diseases.Immunological reviews · 2023
    Review
  7. Structural biology of complement receptors.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  8. Predictors of poor kidney outcome in children with C3 glomerulopathy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel RicklinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. Electronic address: ricklin@upenn.edu.
John D LambrisDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. Electronic address: lambris@upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Role of complement in kidney disorders: from hemodialysis to transportationP01AI068730 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAMBRIS, JOHN D · 2007 to 2018
$16.0M
STRUCTURE-FUNCTION ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT C3 SPECIESR01AI030040 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAMBRIS, JOHN D · 1993 to 2016
$4.1M
VIRAL RESPIRATORY PATHOGENS RESEARCH UNIT /VRPRU/-266030040-266030040N01AI030040 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI APICELLA, MICHAEL A. · 2003 to 2006
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030040NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI068730NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI030040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complement system is a powerful effector arm of innate immunity that typically confers protection from microbial intruders and accumulating debris. In many clinical situations, however, the defensive functions of complement can turn against host cells and induce or exacerbate immune, inflammatory, and degenerative conditions. Although the value of inhibiting complement in a therapeutic context has long been recognized, bringing complement-targeted drugs into clinical use has proved challenging. This important milestone was finally reached a decade ago, yet the clinical availability of complement inhibitors has remained limited. Still, the positive long-term experience with complement drugs and their proven effectiveness in various diseases has reinvigorated interest and confidence in this approach. Indeed, a broad variety of clinical candidates that act at almost any level of the complement activation cascade are currently in clinical development, with several of them being evaluated in phase 2 and phase 3 trials. With antibody-related drugs dominating the panel of clinical candidates, the emergence of novel small-molecule, peptide, protein, and oligonucleotide-based inhibitors offers new options for drug targeting and administration. Whereas all the currently approved and many of the proposed indications for complement-targeted inhibitors belong to the rare disease spectrum, these drugs are increasingly being evaluated for more prevalent conditions. Fortunately, the growing experience from preclinical and clinical use of therapeutic complement inhibitors has enabled a more evidence-based assessment of suitable targets and rewarding indications as well as related technical and safety considerations. This review highlights recent concepts and developments in complement-targeted drug discovery, provides an overview of current and emerging treatment options, and discusses the new milestones ahead on the way to the next generation of clinically available complement therapeutics.

Indexed as

Complement ActivationMolecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsClinical Trials as TopicComplement System ProteinsDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEvidence-Based MedicineHumansImmune Complex DiseasesImmunity, InnateAnti-Inflammatory AgentsComplement System ProteinsComplementImmune modulationInflammationTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID27321574
PMCPMC5404743
OpenAlexW2423078538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.