ReviewJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2016
The study of nevi in children: Principles learned and implications for melanoma diagnosis.
Review in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dermoscopic Features of Plantar and Palmar Melanocytic Nevi in Children: Dermoscopy of Children's Plantar and Palmar Melanocytic Nevi.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026Article
- Improving Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnosis on Pediatric Skin Lesions.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2023Article
- Article
- In vivo microscopy as an adjunctive tool to guide detection, diagnosis, and treatment.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Association between the dermoscopic morphology of peripheral globules and melanocytic lesion diagnosis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2021Article
- Clinical and dermoscopic features of surgically treated melanocytic nevi: a retrospective study of 1046 cases.Chinese medical journal · 2019Article
- Sequential digital dermatoscopic imaging of patients with multiple atypical nevi.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2018Article
- Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2018Article
- Dermoscopic monitoring of pediatric melanocytic nevi regarding pattern and diameter changes.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaArticle
- Clinical and dermoscopic patterns of acquired melanocytic nevi in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study from Turkey.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Melanocytic nevi are a strong phenotypic marker of cutaneous melanoma risk. Changes in nevi during childhood and adolescence make these prime periods for studying nevogenesis. Insights gained by the study of nevi in childhood have implications for melanoma detection in both adults and children. A more comprehensive understanding of the morphologic characteristics of nevi in different anatomic locations, in association with the patient's age and pigmentary phenotype may aid in the identification of melanomas. When monitoring melanocytic lesions over time, it is essential to differentiate normal from abnormal change. This review summarizes the rapidly expanding body of literature relevant to nevus phenotype, particularly in the context of our experience with the Study of Nevi in Children (SONIC) Project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.