Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27319361›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Specific frontal neural dynamics contribute to decisions to check.

Frederic M Stoll, Vincent Fontanier, Emmanuel Procyk

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03483233 (Neural Bases of the Check Process), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03483233 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Neural Bases of the Check Process

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2018 to 2020Enrolled51ConditionsHealthy VolunteersArmsfMRI and EEG study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Consistent Hierarchies of Single-Neuron Timescales in Mice, Macaques, and Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. A distributed subcortical circuit linked to instrumental information-seeking about threat.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Dissociable Representations of Decision Variables within Subdivisions of the Macaque Orbital and Ventrolateral Frontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Dissecting the neurocomputational bases of patch-switching.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  18. The Differential Weights of Motivational and Task Performance Measures on Medial and Lateral Frontal Neural Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frederic M StollUniv Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Inserm, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute U1208, 18 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.
Vincent FontanierUniv Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Inserm, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute U1208, 18 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.
Emmanuel ProcykUniv Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Inserm, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute U1208, 18 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Curiosity and information seeking potently shapes our behaviour and are thought to rely on the frontal cortex. Yet, the frontal regions and neural dynamics that control the drive to check for information remain unknown. Here we trained monkeys in a task where they had the opportunity to gain information about the potential delivery of a large bonus reward or continue with a default instructed decision task. Single-unit recordings in behaving monkeys reveal that decisions to check for additional information first engage midcingulate cortex and then lateral prefrontal cortex. The opposite is true for instructed decisions. Importantly, deciding to check engages neurons also involved in performance monitoring. Further, specific midcingulate activity could be discerned several trials before the monkeys actually choose to check the environment. Our data show that deciding to seek information on the current state of the environment is characterized by specific dynamics of neural activity within the prefrontal cortex.

Indexed as

AnimalsDecision MakingElectrodes, ImplantedExploratory BehaviorFeedback, SensoryGyrus CinguliMacaca mulattaMalePrefrontal CortexRewardSensory Receptor CellsStereotaxic Techniques

Identifiers

PMID27319361
PMCPMC4915137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.