Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27319287›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2016

Limited Margin Radiation Therapy for Children and Young Adults With Ewing Sarcoma Achieves High Rates of Local Tumor Control.

Aimee C Talleur, Fariba Navid, Sheri L Spunt, M Beth McCarville, John Wu, Shenghua Mao, Andrew M Davidoff, Michael D Neel, Matthew J Krasin

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aimee C TalleurDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Fariba NavidDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sheri L SpuntDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
M Beth McCarvilleDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
John WuDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Shenghua MaoDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Andrew M DavidoffDepartment of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Michael D NeelDepartment of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Matthew J KrasinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. Electronic address: matthew.krasin@stjude.org.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USStanford University · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
XENOGRAFT STUDIESP01CA023099 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI HOUGHTON, PETER J · 1985 to 2011
$22.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA023099NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the rate of local failure using focal conformal, limited margin radiation therapy (RT) and dose escalation for tumors ≥8 cm (greatest dimension at diagnosis) in children and young adults with Ewing sarcoma (EWS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients with EWS were treated on a phase 2 institutional trial of focal conformal, limited margin RT using conformal or intensity modulated techniques. The treatment volume incorporated a 1-cm constrained margin around the gross tumor. Unresected tumors, <8 cm at diagnosis, received a standard dose of 55.8 Gy and tumors ≥8 cm, an escalated dose to 64.8 Gy. Patients with microscopic residual disease after resection received adjuvant RT to 50.4 Gy. Adjuvant brachytherapy was permitted in selected patients.

resultsForty-five patients were enrolled: 26 with localized and 19 with metastatic disease. Median (range) age, tumor size, and follow-up were 13.0 years (2.9-24.7 years), 9.0 cm (2.4-17.0 cm), and 54.5 months (1.9-122.2 months), respectively. All patients received systemic chemotherapy. The median (range) RT dose for all patients was 56.1 Gy (45-65.5 Gy). Seventeen patients received adjuvant, 16 standard-dose, and 12 escalated-dose RT. Failures included 1 local, 10 distant, and 1 local/distant. The estimated 10-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 4.4% ± 3.1%, with no statistical difference seen between RT treatment groups and no local failures in the escalated-dose RT treatment group.

conclusionsTreatment with focal conformal, limited margin RT, including dose escalation for larger tumors, provides favorable local tumor control in EWS.

Indexed as

AdolescentBone NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy DosageSarcoma, EwingTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27319287
PMCPMC5713481
OpenAlexW2339139068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.