ArticleIntensive care medicine2016
Pediatric extubation readiness tests should not use pressure support.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ventilation-Weaning Protocols in Children Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Units: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Pooled it
- Guideline
- Executive Summary: International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pediatric Ventilator Liberation, A Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network Document.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Recommendations for mechanical ventilation of critically ill children from the Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation Consensus Conference (PEMVECC).Intensive care medicine · 2017Guideline
- Trial
- Effect of pediatric ventilation weaning technique on work of breathing.Respiratory research · 2022Trial
- [Clinical Study on Early Extubation and Sequential Non-Invasive Respiratory Support for Children with Acute Respiratory Failure Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2022Trial
- Diaphragm ultrasound parameters and rapid shallow breathing index for predicting weaning failure in mechanically ventilated infants: a prospective observational PICU study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Evaluating the Association of Extubation Readiness Testing Performance Variables With Reintubation After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.Respiratory care · 2026Article
- The Practice of Extubation Readiness Testing in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Units: A Cross-sectional Study Based on an Electronic Survey.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2026Article
- Integrated lung-diaphragm ultrasound in pediatric weaning assessment: a mini review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Monitoring of invasive assisted mechanical ventilation: a good clinical practice document by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- [ Extubation failure predictors in the release process of invasive mechanical ventilatory support in pediatrics]Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2025Article
- Postextubation Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Children.Respiratory care · 2025Review
- Esophageal Manometry in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Necessity or Simply a Neighbor of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter?Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025Article
- Protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial of spontaneous breathing trial in children with and without pressure support.Critical care science · 2025Article
- Article
- Implementing the Pediatric Ventilator Liberation Guidelines Using the Most Current Evidence.Respiratory care · 2024Review
- Successful Extubation of Children With Congenital Heart Disease Requires a Specialized Approach.Respiratory care · 2024Article
- Factors Associated With Successful Extubation Readiness Testing in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.Respiratory care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposePressure support is often used for extubation readiness testing, to overcome perceived imposed work of breathing from endotracheal tubes. We sought to determine whether effort of breathing on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 5 cmH2O is higher than post-extubation effort, and if this is confounded by endotracheal tube size or post-extubation noninvasive respiratory support.
methodsProspective trial in intubated children. Using esophageal manometry we compared effort of breathing with pressure rate product under four conditions: pressure support 10/5 cmH2O, CPAP 5 cmH2O (CPAP), and spontaneous breathing 5 and 60 min post-extubation. Subgroup analysis excluded post-extubation upper airway obstruction (UAO) and stratified by endotracheal tube size and post-extubation noninvasive respiratory support.
resultsWe included 409 children. Pressure rate product on pressure support [100 (IQR 60, 175)] was lower than CPAP [200 (120, 300)], which was lower than 5 min [300 (150, 500)] and 60 min [255 (175, 400)] post-extubation (all p < 0.01). Excluding 107 patients with post-extubation UAO (where pressure rate product after extubation is expected to be higher), pressure support still underestimated post-extubation effort by 126-147 %, and CPAP underestimated post-extubation effort by 17-25 %. For all endotracheal tube subgroups, ≤3.5 mmID (n = 152), 4-4.5 mmID (n = 102), and ≥5.0 mmID (n = 48), pressure rate product on pressure support was lower than CPAP and post-extubation (all p < 0.0001), while CPAP pressure rate product was not different from post-extubation (all p < 0.05). These findings were similar for patients extubated to noninvasive respiratory support, where pressure rate product on pressure support before extubation was significantly lower than pressure rate product post-extubation on noninvasive respiratory support (p < 0.0001, n = 81).
conclusionsRegardless of endotracheal tube size, pressure support during extubation readiness tests significantly underestimates post-extubation effort of breathing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.