Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27318936›Full record

SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2016

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: direct comparison and a meta-analysis.

Jin Guo, Youngkwon Seo, Shuo Ren, Sunwoo Hong, Dongki Lee, Soyoun Kim, Yuanyuan Jiang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05125094 (Prognostic Performance of Preoperative and Follow up by Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Patients With HCC After TACE Combined With Ablation), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05125094 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Prognostic Performance of Preoperative and Follow up by Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Patients With HCC After TACE Combined With Ablation: Compared With Non-gadoxetic Enhanced MRI

TypeobservationalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2021 to 2025Enrolled300ConditionsHepatocellular Carcinoma Stage IIIArmsTACE,Ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging in liver metastases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jin GuoDepartment of Anesthesia, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Youngkwon SeoDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Shuo RenDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Sunwoo HongDepartment of Chemistry, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.
Dongki LeeDepartment of Chemistry, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.
Soyoun KimDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Yuanyuan JiangDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea. jiangyuanyuan@dongguk.edu.
Dongguk University · KRSungkyunkwan University · KRSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to directly (head-to-head) compare the per-lesion diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (also referred to as CT hereafter) and gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (also referred to as MRI hereafter) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Studies reporting direct per-lesion comparison data of contrast-enhanced multidetector CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging that were published between January 2000 and January 2015 were analyzed. The data of each study were extracted. Systematic review, paired meta-analysis, and subgroup analysis were performed. Twelve studies including 627 patients and 793 HCC lesions were analyzed. The sensitivity estimates of MRI and CT were, respectively, 0.86 (95% CI 0.76-0.93) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.58-0.80), with significant difference (P < 0.05). The sensitivity estimates were both 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.96) (Chi-square 4.84, degrees of freedom = 1, P > 0.05). In all subgroups, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging was more sensitive than multidetector CT for the detection of HCC, and specificity estimates of both tests maintained at a similarly high level in all conditions: sensitivity estimates of both tests were reduced in studies where patients were diagnosed with HCC solely by liver explant or in those where HCC lesions were small (≤2 cm, especially when ≤1 cm). But in all situations, sensitivities of MRI were higher than those of CT with or without significance. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging showed better per-lesion diagnostic performance than multidetector CT for the diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis and in small hepatic lesions.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMultidetector Computed TomographyCarcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAHumansLiver NeoplasmsContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAComputed tomographyDiagnosisGadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingHepatocellular carcinomaMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID27318936
PMCPMC5018023
OpenAlexW2428245561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.