Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27318835›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2017

Efficacy and tolerability of Z-drug adjunction to antidepressant treatment for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Taro Kishi, Shinji Matsunaga, Nakao Iwata

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Insufficient Evidence to RecommendNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2017
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taro KishiDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan. tarok@fujita-hu.ac.jp.
Shinji MatsunagaDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Nakao IwataDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Fujita Health University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No comprehensive meta-analysis has been performed concerning the efficacy and tolerability of Z-drug adjunctive therapy in antidepressant-treated major depressive disorder (MDD) patients. Randomized, placebo-, or antidepressant-alone-controlled trials of Z-drugs in MDD patients were included. The primary outcome measures for efficacy and safety were remission rate and all-cause discontinuation, respectively. The secondary outcome measures were response rate, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) total score improvement, discontinuation due to inefficacy and adverse events, and individual adverse effects. Risk ratio (RR), number needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH), 95 % confidence intervals, and standardized mean difference (SMD) were calculated. We identified six studies [antidepressants were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine, mean duration of study was 10.5 weeks, mean age of patients (mean ± standard deviation) was 44.4 ± 11.8 years old, total n = 2089, eszopiclone + antidepressants = 642, placebo + antidepressants = 930, antidepressants alone = 112, and zolpidem + antidepressants = 405]. Pooled Z-drug + antidepressants was superior to placebo + antidepressants regarding the remission rate (RR = 0.85, NNT = 10). Although pooled Z-drug + antidepressants was also superior to placebo + antidepressants/antidepressants alone regarding HAMD score improvement (SMD = -0.23), there was not significant difference in response rate and discontinuation due to inefficacy between groups. There was no difference in all-cause discontinuation between groups. Although there was also no difference in discontinuation due to adverse events between groups, pooled Z-drug + antidepressants was associated with a higher incidence of at least one adverse event (RR = 1.09, NNH = 20) and dizziness (RR = 1.76, NNH = 25) compared with the placebo + antidepressants/antidepressants alone. In conclusion, Z-drugs + antidepressants improves the treatment efficacy for MDD compared with the placebo + antidepressants/antidepressants alone. However, the therapy requires close monitoring of adverse events, particularly dizziness.

Indexed as

Drug Therapy, CombinationOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdultAntidepressive AgentsHumansHypnotics and SedativesMajor Depressive DisorderMiddle AgedAntidepressive AgentsHypnotics and SedativesEszopicloneMajor depressive disorderMeta-analysisSystematic reviewZ-drugsZolpidem

Identifiers

PMID27318835
OpenAlexW2443778972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.