Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27318591›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2017

A graph theoretic approach for computing 3D+time biventricular cardiac strain from tagged MRI data.

Ming Li, Himanshu Gupta, Steven G Lloyd, Louis J Dell'Italia, Thomas S Denney

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ming LiAuburn University MRI Research Center, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States. Electronic address: mzl0028@auburn.edu.
Himanshu GuptaDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States. Electronic address: hgupta@uab.edu.
Steven G LloydDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States. Electronic address: sglloyd@uab.edu.
Louis J Dell'ItaliaDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States. Electronic address: loudell@uab.edu.
Thomas S DenneyAuburn University MRI Research Center, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States. Electronic address: dennets@auburn.edu.

Funding

The Impact on Diabetes on Left Ventricular RemodelingP50HL077100 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DELL'LTALIA, LOUIS · 2005 to 2009
$16.5M
Left Ventricular Torsional Hysteresis: A Global Parameter for Diastolic FunctionR01HL104018 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GUPTA, HIMANSHU · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL077100NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL104018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tagged magnetic resonance imaging (tMRI) is a well-established method for evaluating regional mechanical function of the heart. Many techniques have been developed to compute 2D or 3D cardiac deformation and strain from tMRI images. In this paper, we present a new method for measuring 3D plus time biventricular myocardial strain from tMRI data. The method is composed of two parts. First, we use a Gabor filter bank to extract tag points along tag lines. Second, each tag point is classified to one of a set of indexed reference tag lines using a point classification with graph cuts (PCGC) algorithm and a motion compensation technique. 3D biventricular deformation and strain is computed at each image time frame from the classified tag points using a previously published finite difference method. The strain computation is fully automatic after myocardial contours are defined near end-diastole and end-systole. An in-vivo dataset composed of 30 human imaging studies with a range of pathologies was used for validation. Strains computed with the PCGC method with no manual corrections were compared to strains computed from both manually placed tag points and a manually-corrected unwrapped phase method. A typical cardiac imaging study with 10 short-axis slices and 6 long-axis slices required 30 min for contouring followed by 44 min of automated processing. The results demonstrate that the proposed method can reconstruct accurate 3D plus time cardiac strain maps with minimal user intervention.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsGabor filter bankGraph cutsStrainTagged magnetic resonance imaging (tMRI)

Identifiers

PMID27318591
PMCPMC5099089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.