Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27318561›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2016

Small molecule fluorescent voltage indicators for studying membrane potential.

Evan W Miller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Optical Estimation of Bioelectric Patterns in Living Embryos.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Sulfone Rhodamines for Voltage Imaging.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Evan W MillerDepartments of Chemistry, Molecular & Cell Biology, and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, 227 Hildebrand Berkeley, CA 94720-1460, United States. Electronic address: evanwmiller@berkeley.edu.

Funding

Molecular and optogenetic tools for studying voltage in the brainR00NS078561 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MILLER, EVAN WALKER · 2013 to 2015
$713k
NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS078561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voltage imaging has the potential to unravel the contributions that rapid changes in membrane voltage make to cellular physiology, especially in the context of neuroscience. In particular, small molecule fluorophores are especially attractive because they can, in theory, provide fast and sensitive measurements of membrane potential dynamics. A number of classes of small molecule voltage indicators will be discussed, including dyes with improved two-photon voltage sensing, near infrared optical profiles for use in in vivo applications, and newly developed electron-transfer based indicators, or VoltageFluors, that can be tuned across a range of wavelengths to enable all-optical voltage manipulation and measurement. Limitations and a 'wish-list' for voltage indicators will also be discussed.

Indexed as

Membrane PotentialsAnimalsFluorescent DyesHumansNeuronsVoltage-Sensitive Dye ImagingFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID27318561
PMCPMC5018425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.