Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27318493›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2016

Endometrial and cervical cancer patients with multiple sentinel lymph nodes at laparoscopic ICG mapping: How many are enough?

Andrea Papadia, Sara Imboden, Maria Luisa Gasparri, Franziska Siegenthaler, Anja Fink, Michael D Mueller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Sentinel lymph node intraoperative analysis in endometrial cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Article
  6. Surgical staging in endometrial cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea PapadiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Effingerstrasse 102, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. andrea.papadia@insel.ch.
Sara ImbodenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Effingerstrasse 102, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Maria Luisa GasparriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Effingerstrasse 102, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Franziska SiegenthalerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Effingerstrasse 102, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Anja FinkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Effingerstrasse 102, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael D MuellerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Effingerstrasse 102, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe adoption of a sentinel lymph node (SLN) algorithm and the presence of high bilateral detection rates have been associated with increased accuracy of SLN mapping in cervical and endometrial cancer patients. In this context, the significance of the number of SLNs removed has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate (a) whether or not a higher SLN removal count is associated with a reduced false-negative rate and (b) which clinical factors correlate with the number of SLNs removed.

methodsPatients with cervical or endometrial cancer who underwent SLN mapping with bilateral SLN detection followed by lymphadenectomy were evaluated retrospectively. On the basis of the mean number of the SLNs removed, the patients were divided in two groups: Group 1 included patients with up to 3 SLNs removed and Group 2 included patients with more than 3 SLNs removed. Factors predicting a higher SLN count were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis.

resultsEighty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. The two groups consisted of 42 patients each and differed only by the median SLN count. Two endometrial cancer patients in Group 1 had false-negative pelvic SLNs and isolated para-aortic metastases; no false-negative SLNs were recorded in Group 2 (p = n.s.). The results of multivariate analysis indicted that the number of SLNs removed was influenced only in cases where the operating surgeon had performed more than 20 laparoscopic ICG SLN mappings.

conclusionsA higher SLN count does not seem to increase the accuracy of SLN mapping in cervical and endometrial cancer patients.

Indexed as

LaparoscopySentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIndocyanine GreenMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsIndocyanine GreenCervical cancerEchelon lymph nodesEndometrial cancerIndocyanine greenSentinel lymph node countSentinel lymph node mapping

Identifiers

PMID27318493
PMCPMC11819061
OpenAlexW2442782213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.