Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27318429›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2016

The ins(ide) and outs(ide) of asymmetric stem cell division.

Cuie Chen, Jaclyn M Fingerhut, Yukiko M Yamashita

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Reevaluation of whether histones are asymmetrically segregated during asymmetric divisions of stem cells inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Rewinding the clock: mechanisms of dedifferentiation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  7. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division in tissue homeostasis.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2024
    Review
  8. rDNA magnification is a unique feature of germline stem cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Novel roles for RNA binding proteins squid, hephaesteus, and Hrb27C in Drosophila oogenesis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cuie ChenLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Jaclyn M FingerhutLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Cellular and Molecular Biology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Yukiko M YamashitaLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Cellular and Molecular Biology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: yukikomy@umich.edu.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AT MICHIGANT32GM007315 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PUTHENVEEDU, MANOJKUMAR A · 1985 to 2021
$12.8M
Niche-mediated regulation of asymmetric stem cell divisionR01GM118308 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YAMASHITA, YUKIKO · 2016 to 2019
$1.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118308NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many adult stem cells divide asymmetrically, generating one stem cell (self-renewal) and one differentiating cell. Balancing self-renewal and differentiation is critical for sustaining tissue homeostasis throughout the life of an organism. Failure to execute asymmetric stem cell division can have profound impacts on tissue homeostasis, resulting in tissue degeneration or hyperplasia/tumorigenic overgrowth. Recent studies have expanded our understanding of both the extracellular and intracellular mechanisms that regulate, reinforce and ensure an asymmetric outcome following stem cell division. In this review, we discuss newly discovered aspects of asymmetric stem cell division that, in concert with well-established mechanisms, contribute to balancing self-renewal and differentiation.

Indexed as

Asymmetric Cell DivisionAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCellular MicroenvironmentHumansModels, BiologicalStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID27318429
PMCPMC5154912
OpenAlexW2436314643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.