Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27318172›Full record

ArticleChest2016

ICU Use and Quality of Care for Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.

Thomas S Valley, Michael W Sjoding, Zachary D Goldberger, Colin R Cooke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas S ValleyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: valleyt@umich.edu.
Michael W SjodingDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Zachary D GoldbergerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Colin R CookeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Center for Integrative Research in Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, and the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

PULMONARY CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY TRAININGT32HL007749 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Robert Pickett Dickson · 1993 to 2026
$19.9M
Understanding Variation in the Use of Critical Care ServicesK08HS020672 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COOKE, COLIN · 2012 to 2016
$768k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS020672NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality of care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure (HF) varies across hospitals, but the factors driving variation are incompletely understood. We evaluated the relationship between a hospital's ICU or coronary care unit (CCU) admission rate and quality of care provided to patients with AMI or HF.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized in 2010 with AMI or HF was performed. Hospitals were grouped into quintiles according to their risk- and reliability-adjusted ICU admission rates for AMI or HF. We examined the rates that hospitals failed to deliver standard AMI or HF processes of care (process measure failure rates), 30-day mortality, 30-day readmissions, and Medicare spending after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.

resultsHospitals in the lowest quintile had ICU admission rates < 29% for AMI or < 8% for HF. Hospitals in the top quintile had rates > 61% for AMI or > 24% for HF. Hospitals in the highest quintile had higher process measure failure rates for some but not all process measures. Hospitals in the top quintile had greater 30-day mortality (14.8% vs 14.0% [P = .002] for AMI; 11.4% vs 10.6% [P < .001] for HF), but no differences in 30-day readmissions or Medicare spending were seen compared with hospitals in the lowest quintile.

conclusionsHospitals with the highest rates of ICU admission for patients with AMI or HF delivered lower quality of care and had higher 30-day mortality for these conditions. Hospitals with high ICU use may be targets to improve care delivery.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHealth Care CostsHeart FailureHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMedicareMyocardial InfarctionPatient AdmissionPatient Readmissioncardiologyhealth-care utilizationheart failureintensive caremyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID27318172
PMCPMC5028396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.