Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27317800›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2016

S1P Signaling and De Novo Biosynthesis in Blood Pressure Homeostasis.

Anna Cantalupo, Annarita Di Lorenzo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sphingolipids and Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Signal Transduction and Gene Regulation in the Endothelium.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Sphingolipid metabolism and signaling in cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna CantalupoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Vascular Biology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York.
Annarita Di LorenzoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Vascular Biology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York and2039@med.cornell.edu.
Cornell University · US

Funding

Endothelial Sphingolipid Synthesis and Tissue Inflammatory ResponseR01HL126913 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI DI LORENZO, ANNARITA · 2015 to 2023
$3.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initially discovered as abundant components of eukaryotic cell membranes, sphingolipids are now recognized as important bioactive signaling molecules that modulate a variety of cellular functions, including those relevant to cancer and immunologic, inflammatory, and cardiovascular disorders. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of the role of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors in the regulation of vascular function, and focus on how de novo biosynthesized sphingolipids play a role in blood pressure homeostasis. The therapeutic potential of new drugs that target S1P signaling is also discussed.

Indexed as

Blood PressureHomeostasisSignal TransductionAnimalsEndothelium, VascularHumansLysophospholipidsSphingosineVasodilationLysophospholipidsSphingosinesphingosine 1-phosphate

Identifiers

PMID27317800
PMCPMC4959106
OpenAlexW2422279459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.