Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27317704›Full record

Observational studyBritish journal of anaesthesia2016

Beneficial effects of levosimendan on survival in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiovascular surgery.

K Distelmaier, C Roth, L Schrutka, C Binder, B Steinlechner, G Heinz, I M Lang, G Maurer, H Koinig, A Niessner and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in British journal of anaesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of levosimendan on the outcome of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Optimizing POCritical care (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

K DistelmaierDepartment of Internal Medicine II.
C RothDepartment of Internal Medicine II.
L SchrutkaDepartment of Internal Medicine II.
C BinderDepartment of Internal Medicine II.
B SteinlechnerDivision of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
G HeinzDepartment of Internal Medicine II.
I M LangDepartment of Internal Medicine II.
G MaurerDepartment of Internal Medicine II.
H KoinigDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.
A NiessnerDepartment of Internal Medicine II.
M HülsmannDepartment of Internal Medicine II.
W SpeidlDepartment of Internal Medicine II.
G GoliaschDepartment of Internal Medicine II georg.goliasch@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · ATGeorg Fischer (Switzerland) · CHKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of levosimendan treatment on clinical outcome in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support after cardiovascular surgery is unknown. We hypothesized that the beneficial effects of levosimendan might improve survival when adequate end-organ perfusion is ensured by concomitant ECMO therapy. We therefore studied the impact of levosimendan treatment on survival and failure of ECMO weaning in patients after cardiovascular surgery.

methodsWe enrolled a total of 240 patients undergoing veno-arterial ECMO therapy after cardiovascular surgery at a university-affiliated tertiary care centre into our observational single-centre registry.

resultsDuring a median follow-up period of 37 months (interquartile range 19-67 months), 65% of patients died. Seventy-five per cent of patients received levosimendan treatment within the first 24 h after initiation of ECMO therapy. Cox regression analysis showed an association between levosimendan treatment and successful ECMO weaning [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.41; 95% confience interval (CI) 0.22-0.80; P=0.008], 30 day mortality (adjusted HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.30-0.89; P=0.016), and long-term mortality (adjusted HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.42-0.98; P=0.04).

conclusionsThese data suggest an association between levosimendan treatment and improved short- and long-term survival in patients undergoing ECMO support after cardiovascular surgery.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular Surgical ProceduresExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAgedAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrazonesMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPyridazinesRegistriesSimendanSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsHydrazonesPyridazinesSimendancardiac surgeryextracorporeal membrane oxygenationlevosimendanmortalityoutcome

Identifiers

PMID27317704
PMCPMC4913403
OpenAlexW2430498535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.