Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27317661›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2016

Sialylation of Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) Anchors of Mammalian Prions Is Regulated in a Host-, Tissue-, and Cell-specific Manner.

Elizaveta Katorcha, Saurabh Srivastava, Nina Klimova, Ilia V Baskakov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Post-translational modifications in prion diseases.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prion Strains and Transmission Barrier Phenomena.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Analyses of N-linked glycans of PrPThe FEBS journal · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizaveta KatorchaFrom the Center for Biomedical Engineering and Technology and the Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Saurabh SrivastavaFrom the Center for Biomedical Engineering and Technology and the Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Nina KlimovaFrom the Center for Biomedical Engineering and Technology and the Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Ilia V BaskakovFrom the Center for Biomedical Engineering and Technology and the Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 baskakov@umaryland.edu.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Self-Propagating Mechanism of Prion DiseasesR01NS045585 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MD BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE · PI Ilia V Baskakov · 2003 to 2026
$9.6M
Elucidating molecular structure of mammalian prionsR01NS074998 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BASKAKOV, ILIA V · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
Elucidating molecular structure of mammalian prionsR56NS074998 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BASKAKOV, ILIA V · 2011 to 2011
$405k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045585NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074998NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS074998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prions or PrP(Sc) are proteinaceous infectious agents that consist of misfolded, self-replicating states of the prion protein or PrP(C) PrP(C) is posttranslationally modified with N-linked glycans and a sialylated glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor. Conformational conversion of PrP(C) gives rise to glycosylated and GPI-anchored PrP(Sc) The question of the sialylation status of GPIs within PrP(Sc) has been controversial. Previous studies that examined scrapie brains reported that both sialo- and asialo-GPIs were present in PrP(Sc), with the majority being asialo-GPIs. In contrast, recent work that employed cultured cells claimed that only PrP(C) with sialylo-GPIs could be recruited into PrP(Sc), whereas PrP(C) with asialo-GPIs inhibited conversion. To resolve this controversy, we analyzed the sialylation status of GPIs within PrP(Sc) generated in the brain, spleen, or cultured N2a or C2C12 myotube cells. We found that recruiting PrP(C) with both sialo- and asialo-GPIs is a common feature of PrP(Sc) The mixtures of sialo- and asialo-GPIs were observed in PrP(Sc) universally regardless of prion strain as well as host, tissue, or type of cells that produced PrP(Sc) Remarkably, the proportion of sialo- versus asialo-GPIs was found to be controlled by host, tissue, and cell type but not prion strain. In summary, this study found no strain-specific preferences for selecting PrP(C) with sialo- versus asialo-GPIs. Instead, this work suggests that the sialylation status of GPIs within PrP(Sc) is regulated in a cell-, tissue-, or host-specific manner and is likely to be determined by the specifics of GPI biosynthesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineGlycosylationMiceOligosaccharidesOrgan SpecificityPrPSc ProteinsScrapie(6-O-aminoethylphosphonato-mannopyranosyl)-(1-2)-mannopyranosyl-(1-6)-mannopyranosyl-(1-4)-(2-amino-2-deoxyglucopyranosyl)-(1-6)-1-O-(1,2-di-O-octadecanoyl-sn-glyceryl-phosphonato)-myo-inositolOligosaccharidesPrPSc Proteinsbrainglycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI anchor)myotubeprionprion diseasesialic acidsialylationspleen

Identifiers

PMID27317661
PMCPMC5016106
OpenAlexW2425692864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.