Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27317395›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2017

Strategies for Determining Correct Cytochrome P450 Contributions in Hepatic Clearance Predictions: In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation as Modelling Approach and Tramadol as Proof-of Concept Compound.

Huybrecht T'jollyn, Jan Snoeys, Jan Van Bocxlaer, Lies De Bock, Pieter Annaert, Achiel Van Peer, Karel Allegaert, Geert Mannens, An Vermeulen, Koen Boussery

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unravelling the pharmacokinetics of aflatoxin B1:Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  3. The use of PBPK modeling across the pediatric age range using propofol as a case.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Huybrecht T'jollynLaboratory of Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. huybrecht.tjollyn@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2101-9926
Jan SnoeysJanssen Research and Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.
Jan Van BocxlaerLaboratory of Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Lies De BockLaboratory of Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter AnnaertDrug Delivery and Disposition, KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, O&N2, Herestraat 49, Box 921, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Achiel Van PeerJanssen Research and Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.
Karel AllegaertDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Leuven, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
Geert MannensJanssen Research and Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.
An VermeulenLaboratory of Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Koen BousseryLaboratory of Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEJanssen (Belgium) · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAlthough the measurement of cytochrome P450 (CYP) contributions in metabolism assays is straightforward, determination of actual in vivo contributions might be challenging. How representative are in vitro for in vivo CYP contributions? This article proposes an improved strategy for the determination of in vivo CYP enzyme-specific metabolic contributions, based on in vitro data, using an in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) approach. Approaches are exemplified using tramadol as model compound, and CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 as involved enzymes.

methodsMetabolism data for tramadol and for the probe substrates midazolam (CYP3A4) and dextromethorphan (CYP2D6) were gathered in human liver microsomes (HLM) and recombinant human enzyme systems (rhCYP). From these probe substrates, an activity-adjustment factor (AAF) was calculated per CYP enzyme, for the determination of correct hepatic clearance contributions. As a reference, tramadol CYP contributions were scaled-back from in vivo data (retrograde approach) and were compared with the ones derived in vitro. In this view, the AAF is an enzyme-specific factor, calculated from reference probe activity measurements in vitro and in vivo, that allows appropriate scaling of a test drug's in vitro activity to the 'healthy volunteer' population level. Calculation of an AAF, thus accounts for any 'experimental' or 'batch-specific' activity difference between in vitro HLM and in vivo derived activity.

resultsIn this specific HLM batch, for CYP3A4 and CYP2D6, an AAF of 0.91 and 1.97 was calculated, respectively. This implies that, in this batch, the in vitro CYP3A4 activity is 1.10-fold higher and the CYP2D6 activity 1.97-fold lower, compared to in vivo derived CYP activities.

conclusionThis study shows that, in cases where the HLM pool does not represent the typical mean population CYP activities, AAF correction of in vitro metabolism data, optimizes CYP contributions in the prediction of hepatic clearance. Therefore, in vitro parameters for any test compound, obtained in a particular batch, should be corrected with the AAF for the respective enzymes. In the current study, especially the CYP2D6 contribution was found, to better reflect the average in vivo situation. It is recommended that this novel approach is further evaluated using a broader range of compounds.

Indexed as

Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ADextromethorphanHumansKineticsLiverMetabolic Clearance RateMicrosomes, LiverMidazolamTramadolCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ADextromethorphanMidazolamTramadol

Identifiers

PMID27317395
OpenAlexW2437198893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.