ReviewVaccine2016
Adventitious agents and live viral vectored vaccines: Considerations for archiving samples of biological materials for retrospective analysis.
Review in Vaccine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recombinant T7 RNA polymerase production using ClearColi BL21(DE3) and animal-free media for in vitro transcription.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Recombinant vaccines in 2022: a perspective from the cell factory.Microbial cell factories · 2022Review
- Current status and development prospects of aquatic vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Potential SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: Concept, progress, and challenges.International immunopharmacology · 2021Review
- Article
- Evolving pharmacovigilance requirements with novel vaccines and vaccine components.BMJ global health · 2021Review
- Advances for the Hepatitis A Virus Antigen Production Using a Virus Strain With Codon Frequency Optimization Adjustments in Specific Locations.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- An Integrated Platform for Serological Detection and Vaccination of COVID-19.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Sequencing of Historical Isolates, K-mer Mining and High Serological Cross-Reactivity with Ross River Virus Argue against the Presence of Getah Virus in Australia.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Current Clinical Trials Protocols and the Global Effort for Immunization against SARS-CoV-2.Vaccines · 2020Review
- Gene-edited vero cells as rotavirus vaccine substrates.Vaccine: X · 2019Article
- Article
- New Vaccine Technologies to Combat Outbreak Situations.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Vaccines are one of the most effective public health medicinal products with an excellent safety record. As vaccines are produced using biological materials, there is a need to safeguard against potential contamination with adventitious agents. Adventitious agents could be inadvertently introduced into a vaccine through starting materials used for production. Therefore, extensive testing has been recommended at specific stages of vaccine manufacture to demonstrate the absence of adventitious agents. Additionally, the incorporation of viral clearance steps in the manufacturing process can aid in reducing the risk of adventitious agent contamination. However, for live viral vaccines, aside from possible purification of the virus or vector, extensive adventitious agent clearance may not be feasible. In the event that an adventitious agent is detected in a vaccine, it is important to determine its origin, evaluate its potential for human infection and pathology, and discern which batches of vaccine may have been affected in order to take risk mitigation action. To achieve this, it is necessary to have archived samples of the vaccine and ancillary components, ideally from developmental through to current batches, as well as samples of the biological materials used in the manufacture of the vaccine, since these are the most likely sources of an adventitious agent. The need for formal guidance on such vaccine sample archiving has been recognized but not fulfilled. We summarize in this paper several prior major cases of vaccine contamination with adventitious agents and provide points for consideration on sample archiving of live recombinant viral vector vaccines for use in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.