Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27317264›Full record

ReviewVaccine2016

Adventitious agents and live viral vectored vaccines: Considerations for archiving samples of biological materials for retrospective analysis.

Bettina Klug, James S Robertson, Richard C Condit, Stephen J Seligman, Marian P Laderoute, Rebecca Sheets, Anna-Lise Williamson, Marc Gurwith, Sonali Kochhar, Louisa Chapman and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Bettina KlugDivison Immunology Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, D-63225 Langen, Germany.
James S RobertsonIndependent Adviser, UK.
Richard C ConditDepartment of Molecular Genetics & Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Stephen J SeligmanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.
Marian P LaderouteImmune System Management Inc., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5R5.
Rebecca SheetsIndependent Adviser, USA.
Anna-Lise WilliamsonInstitute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town and National Health Laboratory Service, Cape Town, South Africa.
Marc GurwithPaxVax, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.
Sonali KochharGlobal Healthcare Consulting, New Delhi, India.
Louisa ChapmanSecretariat, USA.
Baevin CarberySecretariat, USA.
Lisa M MacSecretariat, USA.
Robert T ChenSecretariat, USA. Electronic address: rtc1@cdc.gov.
Brighton Collaboration Viral Vaccine Vector Safety Working Group. Electronic address: brightoncollaborationv3swg@gmail.com
Communications Research Centre Canada · CANew York Medical College · USPaul Ehrlich Institut · DEPaxVax (United States) · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines are one of the most effective public health medicinal products with an excellent safety record. As vaccines are produced using biological materials, there is a need to safeguard against potential contamination with adventitious agents. Adventitious agents could be inadvertently introduced into a vaccine through starting materials used for production. Therefore, extensive testing has been recommended at specific stages of vaccine manufacture to demonstrate the absence of adventitious agents. Additionally, the incorporation of viral clearance steps in the manufacturing process can aid in reducing the risk of adventitious agent contamination. However, for live viral vaccines, aside from possible purification of the virus or vector, extensive adventitious agent clearance may not be feasible. In the event that an adventitious agent is detected in a vaccine, it is important to determine its origin, evaluate its potential for human infection and pathology, and discern which batches of vaccine may have been affected in order to take risk mitigation action. To achieve this, it is necessary to have archived samples of the vaccine and ancillary components, ideally from developmental through to current batches, as well as samples of the biological materials used in the manufacture of the vaccine, since these are the most likely sources of an adventitious agent. The need for formal guidance on such vaccine sample archiving has been recognized but not fulfilled. We summarize in this paper several prior major cases of vaccine contamination with adventitious agents and provide points for consideration on sample archiving of live recombinant viral vector vaccines for use in humans.

Indexed as

Drug ContaminationPreservation, BiologicalTechnology, PharmaceuticalVirus CultivationAnimalsHumansVaccines, AttenuatedViral VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedViral VaccinesAdventitious agentsBrighton CollaborationLive viral vaccinesSample archivingTraceabilityVaccine manufacturingVaccinesVaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID27317264
PMCPMC5130882
OpenAlexW2425553949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.