Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27317033›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2017

Conservative treatment of acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

Charlotte S Loozen, Jelmer E Oor, Bert van Ramshorst, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Djamila Boerma

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06124989 (A Novel Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Relapse of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06124989 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Novel Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Relapse of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis (Machine learnINg for the rElapse Risk eValuation in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis - MINERVA)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CagliariRan2024 to 2025Enrolled430ConditionsAcute Pancreatitis, Pancreatitis Due to Gallstones, Pancreatitis Biliary, Pancreatitis RelapsingArmsMINERVA Machine Learning model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte S LoozenDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3430 VB, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. c.loozen@antoniusziekenhuis.nl.
Jelmer E OorDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3430 VB, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Bert van RamshorstDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3430 VB, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Hjalmar C van SantvoortDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3430 VB, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Djamila BoermaDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3430 VB, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn medical practice, the tendency to remove an inflamed gallbladder is deeply rooted. Cholecystectomy, however, is associated with relatively high complication rates, and therefore the decision whether or not to perform surgery should be well considered. For some patients, the surgical risk-benefit profile may favour conservative treatment. The objective of this study was to examine the short- and long-term outcome of conservative treatment of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.

methodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Prospective studies reporting on the success rate of conservative treatment (i.e. non-invasive treatment) of acute cholecystitis during index admission were included, as well as prospective and retrospective studies reporting on the recurrence rate of gallstone-related disease during long-term follow-up (i.e. ≥12 months) after initial non-surgical management. Study selection was undertaken independently by two reviewers using predefined criteria. The risk of bias was assessed. The pooled success and mortality rate during index admission and the pooled recurrence rate of gallstone-related disease during long-term follow-up were calculated using a random-effects model.

resultsA total of 1841 patients were included in 10 randomized controlled trials and 14 non-randomized studies. Conservative treatment during index admission was successful in 87 % of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis and in 96 % of patients with mild disease. In the long term, 22 % of the patients developed recurrent gallstone-related disease. Pooled analysis showed a success rate of 86 % (95 % CI 0.8-0.9), a mortality rate of 0.5 % (95 % CI 0.001-0.009) and a recurrence rate of 20 % (95 % CI 0.1-0.3). DISCUSSION: Conservative treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis during index admission seems feasible and safe, especially in patients with mild disease. During long-term follow-up, less than a quarter of the patients appear to develop recurrent gallstone-related disease, although this outcome is based on limited data.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentCholecystectomyCholecystitis, AcuteHumansModels, StatisticalRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeAcute cholecystitisConservativeNon-operativeNon-surgical

Identifiers

PMID27317033
OpenAlexW2423004575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.