Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27316675›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2016

Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS): to measure implementation readiness.

Karina M Egeland, Torleif Ruud, Terje Ogden, Jonas Christoffer Lindstrøm, Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karina M EgelandAkershus University Hospital, Division of Mental Health Services, Sykehusveien 25, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway. karina.egeland@ahus.no.
Torleif RuudAkershus University Hospital, Division of Mental Health Services, Sykehusveien 25, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Terje OgdenNorwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development, Essendropsgate 3, 0368, Oslo, Norway.
Jonas Christoffer LindstrømHelse Sør-Øst Health Services Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Sykehusveien 25, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Kristin Sverdvik HeiervangAkershus University Hospital, Division of Mental Health Services, Sykehusveien 25, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttitudes can be a precursor to the decision of whether or not to try a new practice. In order to tailor the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in mental health settings, we must first consider practitioner attitudes towards EBP adoption. To assess these attitudes, the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) was developed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the EBPAS, and to examine differences in attitudes towards implementing EBPs among mental health practitioners.

methodsThe EBPAS was translated into Norwegian and administered to 294 practitioners from seven primary and 22 specialized mental care units within a defined geographical area of Norway.

resultsThe EBPAS showed good psychometric properties. The less clinical experience the practitioner had, the more positive their attitude toward EBPs. Primary care practitioners reported more positive attitudes towards implementing EBPs that were required of them than specialized care practitioners.

conclusionsThe Norwegian version of the EBPAS is a promising tool for measuring implementation readiness in mental health services, and can be used in clinical practice to tailor implementation efforts.

trial registrationThe study was approved by the regional committees for medical and health research ethics [ REK 2013/2035 ] on 25(th) of May, 2014.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEvidence-Based PracticeMental Health ServicesAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPrimary Health CarePsychiatryPsychologyPsychometricsSpecializationSurveys and QuestionnairesEvidence-based practiceImplementationMental health servicesPractitioner selectionReadiness

Identifiers

PMID27316675
PMCPMC4912744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.