ArticleHuman genomics2016
Proposed nomenclature for microhaplotypes.
Article in Human genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developmental validation of a six-dye Multi-InDels kit for personal identification and paternity testing of highly degraded DNA samples.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-assisted analysis of saliva-containing mixtures using a saliva-specific multi-CpG-microhaplotype marker system.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Novel Microhaplotype Panel for DNA Mixture and Kinship Analysis.Electrophoresis · 2026Article
- Application of a new composite genetic marker semen-specific methylation-microhaplotype in the analysis of semen-vaginal fluid mixtures.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Article
- State of the Art for Microhaplotypes.Genes · 2022Article
- A sequence-based 163plex microhaplotype assay for forensic DNA analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- The application of short and highly polymorphic microhaplotype loci in paternity testing and sibling testing of temperature-dependent degraded samples.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Identification and sequencing of 59 highly polymorphic microhaplotypes for analysis of DNA mixtures.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- DIP-microhaplotypes: new markers for detection of unbalanced DNA mixtures.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Validation of novel forensic DNA markers using multiplex microhaplotype sequencing.Forensic science international. Genetics · 2020Article
- Construction and forensic application of 20 highly polymorphic microhaplotypes.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Multi-Indel: A Microhaplotype Marker Can Be Typed Using Capillary Electrophoresis Platforms.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- MicroHapDB: A Portable and Extensible Database of All Published Microhaplotype Marker and Frequency Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Identifying novel microhaplotypes for ancestry inference.International journal of legal medicine · 2019Article
- Mixture deconvolution by massively parallel sequencing of microhaplotypes.International journal of legal medicine · 2019Article
- Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).International journal of legal medicine · 2018Review
- Ancestry inference of 96 population samples using microhaplotypes.International journal of legal medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microhaplotypes are a new type of genetic marker in forensics and population genetics. A standardized nomenclature is desirable. A simple approach that does not require a central authority for approval is proposed. The nomenclature proposed follows the recommendation of the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee ( http://www.genenames.org ): "We strongly encourage naming families and groups of genes related by sequence and/or function using a "root" symbol. This is an efficient and informative way to name related genes, and already works well for a number of established gene families…" The proposal involves a simple root consisting of "mh" followed by the two-digit chromosome number and unique characters established by the authors in the initial publication. We suggest the unique symbol be an indication of the laboratory followed by characters unique to the chromosome and laboratory. For instance, the microhaplotype symbol mh01KK-001 refers to a locus on chromosome 1 published by the Kidd Lab (KK-) as their #001. Publication defines mh01KK-001 as comprised of four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs4648344, rs6663840, rs58111155, and rs6688969.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.