Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27316444›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2016

A dual tracer (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT pilot study for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Lars C Gormsen, Ate Haraldsen, Stine Kramer, Andre H Dias, Won Yong Kim, Per Borghammer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01729169 (Diagnosing Cardiac Sarcoidosis Using FDG PET), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01729169 completednot on this map

Diagnosing Cardiac Sarcoidosis Using FDG PET: Optimization

TypeobservationalSponsorLars Christian GormsenRan2012 to 2015Enrolled19ConditionsSarcoidosis, Cardiac Sarcoidosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET for detection of cardiac sarcoidosis; A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Beyond the Biopsy: Imaging Frontiers in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Screening for cardiac involvement in patients with sarcoidosis using AIIMS algorithm.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Use of PET/CT to detect myocardial inflammation and the risk of malignant arrhythmia in chronic Chagas disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Vascular adhesion protein-1-targeted PET imaging in autoimmune myocarditis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Utility of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in therapeutic monitoring of cardiac sarcoidosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Reference myocardial uptake values on somatostatin receptor-targeted PET: not yet in preference to visual assessment.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Potential clinical utility ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Semiquantitative evaluation ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lars C GormsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. lars.christian.gormsen@clin.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6937-704X
Ate HaraldsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Stine KramerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Andre H DiasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Won Yong KimDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Per BorghammerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a potentially fatal condition lacking a single test with acceptable diagnostic accuracy. (18)F-FDG PET/CT has emerged as a promising imaging modality, but is challenged by physiological myocardial glucose uptake. An alternative tracer, (68)Ga-DOTANOC, binds to somatostatin receptors on inflammatory cells in sarcoid granulomas. We therefore aimed to conduct a proof-of-concept study using (68)Ga-DOTANOC to diagnose CS. In addition, we compared diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer variability of (68)Ga-DOTANOC vs. (18)F-FDG PET/CT.

methodsNineteen patients (seven female) with suspected CS were prospectively recruited and dual tracer scanned within 7 days. PET images were reviewed by four expert readers for signs of CS and compared to the reference standard (Japanese ministry of Health and Welfare CS criteria).

resultsCS was diagnosed in 3/19 patients. By consensus, 11/19 (18)F-FDG scans and 0/19 (68)Ga-DOTANOC scans were rated as inconclusive. The sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET for diagnosing CS was 33 %, specificity was 88 %, PPV was 33 %, NPV was 88 %, and diagnostic accuracy was 79 %. For (68)Ga-DOTANOC, accuracy was 100 %. Inter-observer agreement was poor for (18)F-FDG PET (Fleiss' combined kappa 0.27, NS) and significantly better for (68)Ga-DOTANOC (Fleiss' combined kappa 0.46, p = 0.001).

conclusionsDespite prolonged pre-scan fasting, a large proportion of (18)F-FDG PET/CT images were rated as inconclusive, resulting in low agreement among reviewers and correspondingly poor diagnostic accuracy. By contrast, (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT had excellent diagnostic accuracy with the caveat that inter-observer variability was still significant. Nevertheless, (68)Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT looks very promising as an alternative CS PET tracer.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials NCT01729169 .

Indexed as

Cardiac sarcoidosisHeart failureInflammationPET/CTSomatostatin receptor imaging

Identifiers

PMID27316444
PMCPMC4912521
OpenAlexW2432305593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.