Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27316335›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women.

Stine Bernitz, Pål Øian, Leiv Sandvik, Ellen Blix

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00857129 (Differentiated Birth Service- an Improvement?), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00857129 nacompletednot on this map

Differentiated Birth Service- an Improvement?

TypeinterventionalSponsorOstfold Hospital TrustRan2006 to 2013Enrolled1,111ConditionsLow Risk Birth, Births With Low Risk FactorArmsNormal Unit, Special birth unit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Woman-Centered Care: Standardized Outcomes Measure.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Freestanding Midwife-Led Units: A Narrative Review.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stine BernitzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Sarpsborg, Norway.
Pål ØianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Leiv SandvikUnit for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ellen BlixDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway. ellen.blix@hioa.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSatisfaction with birth care is part of quality assessment of care. The aim of this study was to investigate possible differences in satisfaction with intrapartum care among low-risk women, randomized to a midwifery unit or to an obstetric unit within the same hospital.

methodsRandomized controlled trial conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Norway. A total of 485 women with no expressed preference for level of birth care, assessed to be at low-risk at onset of spontaneous labor were included. To assess the overall satisfaction with intrapartum care, the Labour and Delivery Satisfaction Index (LADSI) questionnaire, was sent to the participants 6 months after birth. To assess women's experience with intrapartum transfer, four additional items were added. In addition, we tested the effects of the following aspects on satisfaction; obstetrician involved, intrapartum transfer from the midwifery unit to the obstetric unit during labor, mode of delivery and epidural analgesia.

resultsWomen randomized to the midwifery unit were significantly more satisfied with intrapartum care than those randomized to the obstetric unit (183 versus 176 of maximum 204 scoring points, mean difference 7.2, p = 0.002). No difference was found between the units for women who had an obstetrician involved during labor or delivery and who answered four additional questions on this aspect (mean item score 4.0 at the midwifery unit vs 4.3 at the obstetric unit, p = 0.3). Intrapartum transfer from the midwifery unit to an obstetric unit, operative delivery and epidurals influenced the level of overall satisfaction in a negative direction regardless of allocated unit (p < 0.001).

conclusionLow-risk women with no expressed preference for level of birth care were more satisfied if allocated to the midwifery unit compared to the obstetric unit.

trial registrationThe trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00857129 . Initially released 03/05/2009.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdultAnalgesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, ObstetricalDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMidwiferyObstetricsObstetrics and Gynecology Department, HospitalParturitionPatient TransferPerinatal CarePregnancyRisk FactorsBirth care unitIntrapartum careLow-risk birthSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID27316335
PMCPMC4912783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.