Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27315823›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2016

A proof-of-concept study on the combination of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and relaxation techniques in chronic tinnitus.

Peter M Kreuzer, Timm B Poeppl, Jan Bulla, Winfried Schlee, Astrid Lehner, Berthold Langguth, Martin Schecklmann

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Rationale and study design of a trial to assessContemporary clinical trials communications · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Improving the role of rTMS and tDCS in the treatment of chronic tinnitus by combining other rehabilitation techniques].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter M KreuzerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. peter.kreuzer@medbo.de.
Timm B PoepplDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Jan BullaDepartment of Mathematics, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7800, 5020, Bergen, Norway.
Winfried SchleeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Astrid LehnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Berthold LangguthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin SchecklmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
University of Regensburg · DEUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interference of ongoing neuronal activity and brain stimulation motivated this study to combine repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and relaxation techniques in tinnitus patients. Forty-two patients were enrolled in this one-arm proof-of-concept study to receive ten sessions of rTMS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and temporo-parietal cortex. During stimulation, patients listened to five different kinds of relaxation audios. Variables of interest were tinnitus questionnaires, tinnitus numeric rating scales, depressivity, and quality of life. Results were compared to results of historical control groups having received the same rTMS protocol (active control) and sham treatment (placebo) without relaxation techniques. Thirty-eight patients completed the treatment, drop-out rates and adverse events were low. Responder rates (reduction in tinnitus questionnaire (TQ) score ≥5 points 10 weeks after treatment) were 44.7 % in the study, 27.8 % in the active control group, and 21.7 % in the placebo group, differing between groups on a near significant level. For the tinnitus handicap inventory (THI), the main effect of group was not significant. However, linear mixed model analyses showed that the relaxation/rTMS group differed significantly from the active control group showing steeper negative THI trend for the relaxation/rTMS group indicating better amelioration over the course of the trial. Deepness of relaxation during rTMS and selection of active relaxation vs. passive listening to music predicted larger TQ. All remaining secondary outcomes turned out non-significant. This combined treatment proved to be a safe, feasible and promising approach to enhance rTMS treatment effects in chronic tinnitus.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChronic DiseaseCombined Modality TherapyDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexQuality of LifeRelaxation TherapyRetrospective StudiesChronic tinnitusHypnosisMuscle relaxationRelaxationRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27315823
OpenAlexW2441301280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.