Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27315537›Full record

ReviewNature chemical biology2016

Progress and prospects for small-molecule probes of bacterial imaging.

Ozden Kocaoglu, Erin E Carlson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gut microbes · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Superresolution imaging of antibiotic-induced structural disruption of bacteria enabled by photochromic glycomicelles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Computerized fluorescence microscopy of microbial cells.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ozden KocaogluDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Erin E CarlsonDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Targeted natural product diversification to identify novel antibacterial agentsDP2OD008592 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CARLSON, ERIN ELIZABETH · 2011 to 2011
$2.2M
NIH HHS DP2 OD008592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence microscopy is an essential tool for the exploration of cell growth, division, transcription and translation in eukaryotes and prokaryotes alike. Despite the rapid development of techniques to study bacteria, the size of these organisms (1-10 μm) and their robust and largely impenetrable cell envelope present major challenges in imaging experiments. Fusion-based strategies, such as attachment of the protein of interest to a fluorescent protein or epitope tag, are by far the most common means for examining protein localization and expression in prokaryotes. While valuable, the use of genetically encoded tags can result in mislocalization or altered activity of the desired protein, does not provide a readout of the catalytic state of enzymes and cannot enable visualization of many other important cellular components, such as peptidoglycan, lipids, nucleic acids or glycans. Here, we highlight the use of biomolecule-specific small-molecule probes for imaging in bacteria.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, MolecularMolecular ImagingMolecular ProbesSmall Molecule LibrariesMolecular ProbesSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID27315537
PMCPMC5736371
OpenAlexW2443104314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.