Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27315329›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of eukaryotic microbiology2016

Genome Editing by CRISPR/Cas9: A Game Change in the Genetic Manipulation of Protists.

Noelia Lander, Miguel A Chiurillo, Roberto Docampo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glycosomal Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase CRISPR/Cas9-Deletion and Its Role in Trypanosoma cruzi Metacyclogenesis and Infectivity in Mammalian Host.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Cloning-Free Genome Editing by CRISPR/T7RNAP/Cas9 in Trypanosoma cruzi.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. CRISPR-Cas9: Taming protozoan parasites with bacterial scissor.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Review
  6. Ablation of theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. The long and winding road of reverse genetics inMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A CRISPR/Cas9-riboswitch-Based Method for Downregulation of Gene Expression inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Tissue Destruction Caused byCurrent clinical microbiology reports · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Noelia LanderDepartamento de Patologia Clínica, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083, Brazil.
Miguel A ChiurilloDepartamento de Patologia Clínica, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083, Brazil.
Roberto DocampoDepartamento de Patologia Clínica, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

Pathogenesis of Trypanosoma cruzi infectionR01AI107663 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DOCAMPO, ROBERTO · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
Pathogenesis of Trypanosoma cruzi infectionR56AI107663 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DOCAMPO, ROBERTO · 2013 to 2013
$350k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI107663NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI107663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing by CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas9 (CRISPR-associated gene 9) system has been transformative in biology. Originally discovered as an adaptive prokaryotic immune system, CRISPR/Cas9 has been repurposed for genome editing in a broad range of model organisms, from yeast to mammalian cells. Protist parasites are unicellular organisms producing important human diseases that affect millions of people around the world. For many of these diseases, such as malaria, Chagas disease, leishmaniasis and cryptosporidiosis, there are no effective treatments or vaccines available. The recent adaptation of the CRISPR/Cas9 technology to several protist models will be playing a key role in the functional study of their proteins, in the characterization of their metabolic pathways, and in the understanding of their biology, and will facilitate the search for new chemotherapeutic targets. In this work we review recent studies where the CRISPR/Cas9 system was adapted to protist parasites, particularly to Apicomplexans and trypanosomatids, emphasizing the different molecular strategies used for genome editing of each organism, as well as their advantages. We also discuss the potential usefulness of this technology in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Indexed as

Gene EditingAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsApicomplexaChlamydomonas reinhardtiiClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCryptosporidium parvumEukaryotaLeishmaniaModels, BiologicalPlasmodiumToxoplasmaTrypanosoma cruziTrypanosomatinaApicomplexaChlamydomonastrypanosomes

Identifiers

PMID27315329
PMCPMC5012946
OpenAlexW2443441049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.