Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27315265›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2016

Sampling over Nonuniform Distributions: A Neural Efficiency Account of the Primacy Effect in Statistical Learning.

Elisabeth A Karuza, Ping Li, Daniel J Weiss, Federica Bulgarelli, Benjamin D Zinszer, Richard N Aslin

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Statistical Learning of Multiple Structures by 8-Month-Old Infants.Proceedings of the ... Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston University Conference on Language Development · 2017
    Article
  11. The neurobiology of uncertainty: implications for statistical learning.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  12. Anchors aweigh: The impact of overlearning on entrenchment effects in statistical learning.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisabeth A KaruzaUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Ping LiPennsylvania State University.
Daniel J WeissPennsylvania State University.
Federica BulgarelliPennsylvania State University.
Benjamin D ZinszerUniversity of Rochester.
Richard N AslinUniversity of Rochester.

Funding

Visual statistical learning in human infantsR01HD037082 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI ASLIN, RICHARD N., NEWPORT, ELISSA L · 1999 to 2022
$6.1M
Statistical learning of multiple patterns in infants, adults, and monkeysR01HD067250 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI WEISS, DANIEL J · 2011 to 2015
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037082NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful knowledge acquisition requires a cognitive system that is both sensitive to statistical information and able to distinguish among multiple structures (i.e., to detect pattern shifts and form distinct representations). Extensive behavioral evidence has highlighted the importance of cues to structural change, demonstrating how, without them, learners fail to detect pattern shifts and are biased in favor of early experience. Here, we seek a neural account of the mechanism underpinning this primacy effect in learning. During fMRI scanning, adult participants were presented with two artificial languages: a familiar language (L1) on which they had been pretrained followed by a novel language (L2). The languages were composed of the same syllable inventory organized according to unique statistical structures. In the absence of cues to the transition between languages, posttest familiarity judgments revealed that learners on average more accurately segmented words from the familiar language compared with the novel one. Univariate activation and functional connectivity analyses showed that participants with the strongest learning of L1 had decreased recruitment of fronto-subcortical and posterior parietal regions, in addition to a dissociation between downstream regions and early auditory cortex. Participants with a strong new language learning capacity (i.e., higher L2 scores) showed the opposite trend. Thus, we suggest that a bias toward neural efficiency, particularly as manifested by decreased sampling from the environment, accounts for the primacy effect in learning. Potential implications of this hypothesis are discussed, including the possibility that "inefficient" learning systems may be more sensitive to structural changes in a dynamic environment.

Indexed as

Probability LearningAdolescentAdultAuditory PerceptionBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansJudgmentLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysNeuropsychological TestsRecognition, PsychologyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27315265
PMCPMC5576997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.