Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27315226›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Investigation of Amphibian Mortality Events in Wildlife Reveals an On-Going Ranavirus Epidemic in the North of the Netherlands.

Jolianne M Rijks, Bernardo Saucedo, Annemarieke Spitzen-van der Sluijs, Gavin S Wilkie, Alphons J A M van Asten, Jan van den Broek, Roschong Boonyarittichaikij, Marisca Stege, Fleur van der Sterren, An Martel and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Complete Genome Sequence ofGenome announcements · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jolianne M RijksDutch Wildlife Health Centre, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bernardo SaucedoDutch Wildlife Health Centre, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Annemarieke Spitzen-van der SluijsReptile, Amphibian and Fish Conservation Netherlands, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gavin S WilkieMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Alphons J A M van AstenDutch Wildlife Health Centre, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan van den BroekDepartment of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roschong BoonyarittichaikijDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Marisca StegeDepartment of Pathobiology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fleur van der SterrenReptile, Amphibian and Fish Conservation Netherlands, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
An MartelDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Frank PasmansDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Joseph HughesMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Andrea GröneDutch Wildlife Health Centre, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Steven J van BeurdenDepartment of Pathobiology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marja J L KikDutch Wildlife Health Centre, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLGhent University · BEMRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801822Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the four years following the first detection of ranavirus (genus Ranavirus, family Iridoviridae) infection in Dutch wildlife in 2010, amphibian mortality events were investigated nationwide to detect, characterize and map ranaviruses in amphibians over time, and to establish the affected host species and the clinico-pathological presentation of the disease in these hosts. The ultimate goal was to obtain more insight into ranavirus disease emergence and ecological risk. In total 155 dead amphibians from 52 sites were submitted between 2011 and 2014, and examined using histopathology, immunohistochemistry, virus isolation and molecular genetic characterization. Ranavirus-associated amphibian mortality events occurred at 18 sites (35%), initially only in proximity of the 2010 index site. Specimens belonging to approximately half of the native amphibian species were infected, including the threatened Pelobates fuscus (spadefoot toad). Clustered massive outbreaks involving dead adult specimens and ranavirus genomic identity indicated that one common midwife toad virus (CMTV)-like ranavirus strain is emerging in provinces in the north of the Netherlands. Modelling based on the spatiotemporal pattern of spread showed a high probability that this emerging virus will continue to be detected at new sites (the discrete reproductive power of this outbreak is 0.35). Phylogenetically distinct CMTV-like ranaviruses were found in the south of the Netherlands more recently. In addition to showing that CMTV-like ranaviruses threaten wild amphibian populations not only in Spain but also in the Netherlands, the current spread and risk of establishment reiterate that understanding the underlying causes of CMTV-like ranavirus emergence requires international attention.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAmphibiansAnimalsAnimals, WildDNA Virus InfectionsEpidemicsNecrosisNetherlandsRanavirusSequence Alignment

Identifiers

PMID27315226
PMCPMC4912076
OpenAlexW2429512828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.