ArticleCritical care medicine2016
Liberal Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: An Exploratory Study.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of liberal glucose control on critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Individualised versus conventional glucose control in critically-ill patients: the CONTROLING study-a randomized clinical trial.Intensive care medicine · 2021Trial
- Dysglycaemia and the interaction of chronic and acute glycaemia with mortality post cardiac surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Critical care nutrition and the legacy of Rinaldo Bellomo.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Review
- Relationship between time-weighted average glucose and mortality in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Observational
- Article
- The Use of Biomarkers in Pharmacovigilance: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Biomarker insights · 2023Review
- Relative Hypoglycemia is Associated with Delirium in Critically Ill Patients with Diabetes: A Cohort Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022Article
- Glycemic targets in critically ill adults: A mini-review.World journal of diabetes · 2021Review
- Blood Sugar Targets in Surgical Intensive Care—Management and Special Considerations in Patients With DiabetesDeutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021Review
- Optimal Blood Glucose Monitoring Interval for Insulin Infusion in Critically Ill Non-Cardiothoracic Patients: A Pilot Study.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2021Article
- Study protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Liberal Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients with Pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes (LUCID) trial.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2020Article
- Association between Achievement of Estimated Average Glucose Level and 6-Month Neurologic Outcome in Comatose Cardiac Arrest Survivors: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Insulin therapy is not associated with improved clinical outcomes in critically ill infants with stress hyperglycemia.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
- Glycated hemoglobin A1c level on the day of emergency surgery is a marker of premorbid glycemic control: a retrospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2018Observational
- The Long and Winding Road Toward Personalized Glycemic Control in the Critically Ill.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018Review
- Acute glycemic control in diabetics. How sweet is oprimal? Con: Just as sweet as in nondiabetic is better.Journal of intensive care · 2018Review
- Acute glycemic control in diabetics. How sweet is oprimal? Pro: Sweeter is better in diabetes.Journal of intensive care · 2018Article
- Hypoglycemia Reduction Strategies in the ICU.Current diabetes reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe optimal blood glucose target in critically ill patients with preexisting diabetes and chronic hyperglycemia is unknown. In such patients, we aimed to determine whether a " liberal" approach to glycemic control would reduce hypoglycemia and glycemic variability and appear safe.
designProspective, open-label, sequential-period exploratory study.
settingMedical-surgical ICU. PATIENTS: During sequential 6-month periods, we studied 83 patients with preexisting type 2 diabetes and chronic hyperglycemia (glycated hemoglobin, ≥ 7.0% at ICU admission).
interventionDuring the "standard care" period, 52 patients received insulin to treat blood glucose concentrations greater than 10 mmol/L whereas during the "liberal" period, 31 patients received insulin to treat blood glucose concentrations greater than 14 mmol/L. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsTime-weighted mean glucose concentrations and the number and duration of moderate (< 4.0 mmol/L) and severe (≤ 2.2 mmol/L) hypoglycemic episodes were recorded, with moderate and severe hypoglycemic episodes grouped together. Glycemic variability was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variability for each patient. Safety was evaluated using clinical outcomes and plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation, glucose-turnover, and oxidative stress. Mean glucose (TWglucoseday 0-7, standard care: 9.3 [1.8] vs liberal: 10.3 [2.1] mmol/L; p = 0.02) and nadir blood glucose (4.4 [1.5] vs 5.5 [1.6] mmol/L; p < 0.01) were increased during the liberal period. There was a signal toward reduced risk of moderate-severe hypoglycemia (relative risk: liberal compared with standard care: 0.47 [95% CI, 0.19-1.13]; p = 0.09). Ten patients (19%) during the standard period and one patient (3%) during the liberal period had recurrent episodes of moderate-severe hypoglycemia. Liberal therapy reduced glycemic variability (coefficient of variability, 33.2% [12.9%] vs 23.8% [7.7%]; p < 0.01). Biomarker data and clinical outcomes were similar.
conclusionsIn critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic hyperglycaemia, liberal glycemic control appears to attenuate glycemic variability and may reduce the prevalence of moderate-severe hypoglycemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.