ArticleAnnals of neurology2016
Direct current stimulation induces mGluR5-dependent neocortical plasticity.
Article in Annals of neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Transcranial direct current stimulation on social communication among children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: a meta-analysis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- Memory and Cognition-Related Neuroplasticity Enhancement by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Rodents: A Systematic Review.Neural plasticity · 2020Pooled it
- Transcranial direct current stimulation leads to faster acquisition of motor skills, but effects are not maintained at retention.PloS one · 2022Trial
- Robust enhancement of motor sequence learning with 4 mA transcranial electric stimulation.Brain stimulationTrial
- Visual Perception and Gamma Oscillations in Cat V1 are Dynamically Correlated in Contrast Sensitivity Functions.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Article
- Glutamate Metabotropic Receptors-Linked Postsynaptic Density Proteins: An Emergent Hub for Antipsychotics' Regulation of Synaptic Plasticity and Metaplasticity.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Direct current stimulation induced reduction in α-synuclein in primary neurons: targeting Parkinson's disease.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Repeated tDCS at Clinically Relevant Field Intensity Can Boost Concurrent Motor Learning in Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Safety of ipsilesional anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in acute photothrombotic stroke: implications for early neurorehabilitation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Boosting Psychotherapy With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: The Whys and Wherefores of Modulating Neural Plasticity to Promote Therapeutic Change.Neural plasticity · 2024Review
- Brain stimulation-on-a-chip: a neuromodulation platform for brain slices.Lab on a chip · 2023Article
- A microfluidic perspective on conventional in vitro transcranial direct current stimulation methods.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2023Review
- Article
- Review
- Immediate and after effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in the mouse primary somatosensory cortex.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The effects of lithium chloride and cathodal/anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on conditional fear memory changes and the level of p-mTOR/mTOR in PFC of male NMRI mice.Metabolic brain disease · 2021Article
- From adults to pediatrics: A review noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to facilitate recovery from brain injury.Progress in brain research · 2021Review
- Rethinking Intellectual Disability from Neuro- to Astro-Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo obtain insights into mechanisms mediating changes in cortical excitability induced by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
methodsNeocortical slices were exposed to direct current stimulation (DCS) delivered through Ag/AgCl electrodes over a range of current orientations, magnitudes, and durations. DCS-induced cortical plasticity and its receptor dependency were measured as the change in layer II/III field excitatory postsynaptic potentials by a multielectrode array, both with and without neurotransmitter receptor blockers or allosteric modulators. In vivo, tDCS was delivered to intact mice scalp via surface electrodes. Molecular consequences of DCS in vitro or tDCS in vivo were tested by immunoblot of protein extracted from stimulated slices or the neocortex harvested from stimulated intact mice.
resultsCathodal DCS in vitro induces a long-term depression (DCS-LTD) of excitatory synaptic strength in both human and mouse neocortical slices. DCS-LTD is abolished with an mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator, mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, and inhibitor of protein synthesis. However, DCS-LTD persists despite either γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor or N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor inhibition. An mGluR5-positive allosteric modulator, in contrast, transformed transient synaptic depression resultant from brief DCS application into durable DCS-LTD.
interpretationWe identify a novel molecular pathway by which tDCS modulates cortical excitability, and indicate a capacity for synergistic interaction between tDCS and pharmacologic mGluR5 facilitation. The findings support exploration of cathodal tDCS as a treatment of neurologic conditions characterized by aberrant regional cortical excitability referable to mGluR5-mTOR signaling. Ann Neurol 2016;80:233-246.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.