Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27314861›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2017

Defining the optimal sequence for the systemic treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

J A Mestres, A B iMolins, L C Martínez, J I C López-Muñiz, E C Gil, A de Juan Ferré, S Del Barco Berrón, Y F Pérez, J G Mata, A G Palomo and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. MicroRNAs as therapeutic targets in breast cancer metastasis.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The economic burden of metastatic breast cancer in Spain.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

J A MestresHospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
A B iMolinsHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
L C MartínezComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
J I C López-MuñizHospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
E C GilHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
A de Juan FerréHospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
S Del Barco BerrónInstitut Català d'Oncologia, Girona, Spain.
Y F PérezHospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
J G MataHospital Santa María Nai en Ourense, Orense, Spain.
A G PalomoComplejo Asistencial de León, Léon, Spain.
J G GregoriFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
P G PardoHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
J J I MañasComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
A L HernándezHospital Clínic Universitari de València, València, Spain.
E M de DueñasConsorcio Hospitalario i Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
N M JáñezHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
S M MurilloHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
J S BofillHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme, Seville, Spain.
P Z AuñónHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
P Sanchez-RoviraComplejo Hospitalario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain. oncopsr@yahoo.es.
Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESConsorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón · ESFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESHospital Universitario de Valme · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Virgen de la Salud · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that presents in varying forms, and a growing number of therapeutic options makes it difficult to determine the best choice in each particular situation. When selecting a systemic treatment, it is important to consider the medication administered in the previous stages, such as acquired resistance, type of progression, time to relapse, tumor aggressiveness, age, comorbidities, pre- and post-menopausal status, and patient preferences. Moreover, tumor genomic signatures can identify different subtypes, which can be used to create patient profiles and design specific therapies. However, there is no consensus regarding the best treatment sequence for each subgroup of patients. During the SABCC Congress of 2014, specialized breast cancer oncologists from referral hospitals in Europe met to define patient profiles and to determine specific treatment sequences for each one. Conclusions were then debated in a final meeting in which a relative degree of consensus for each treatment sequence was established. Four patient profiles were defined according to established breast cancer phenotypes: pre-menopausal patients with luminal subtype, post-menopausal patients with luminal subtype, patients with triple-negative subtype, and patients with HER2-positive subtype. A treatment sequence was then defined, consisting of hormonal therapy with tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, fulvestrant, and mTOR inhibitors for pre- and post-menopausal patien ts; a chemotherapy sequence for the first, second, and further lines for luminal and triple-negative patients; and an optimal sequence for treatment with new antiHER2 therapies. Finally, a document detailing all treatment sequences, that had the agreement of all the oncologists, was drawn up as a guideline and advocacy tool for professionals treating patients with this disease.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAntineoplastic AgentsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneChemotherapyHER2 receptorHormone therapyMetastatic breast cancerTargeted therapiesTriple-negative tumor

Identifiers

PMID27314861
PMCPMC5239809
OpenAlexW2420100166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.