Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27314835›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2016

Surface functionalization and dynamics of polymeric cell culture substrates.

John D Krutty, Samantha K Schmitt, Padma Gopalan, William L Murphy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John D KruttyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, USA.
Samantha K SchmittDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, USA.
Padma GopalanDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, USA; Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, USA.
William L MurphyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, USA; Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, USA; Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, USA. Electronic address: wlmurphy@wisc.edu.

Funding

Biomaterials for local regulation of growth factor signalingR01HL093282 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MURPHY, WILLIAM L. · 2009 to 2018
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL093282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promise of growing tissues to replace or improve the function of failing ones, a practice often referred to as regenerative medicine, has been driven in recent years by the development of stem cells and cell lines. Stem cells are typically cultured outside the body to increase cell number or differentiate the cells into mature cell types. In order to maximize the regenerative potential of these cells, there is a need to understand cell-material interactions that direct cell behavior and cell-material dynamics. Most synthetic surfaces used for growth and differentiation of cells in the lab are impractical and cost prohibitive in clinical labs. This review focuses on the modification of low cost polymer substrates that are already widely used for cell culture so that they may be used to control and understand cell-material interactions. In addition, we discuss the ability of cells to exert dynamic control over the microenvironment leading to a more complex, less controlled surface.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsCell CommunicationCell Culture TechniquesHumansPolymersRegenerative MedicineStem CellsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID27314835
PMCPMC6893855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.