Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27314389›Full record

ReviewCells2016

Under Pressure: Mechanical Stress Management in the Nucleus.

Néjma Belaadi, Julien Aureille, Christophe Guilluy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cellular and Nuclear Forces: An Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cellular Features Revealed by Transverse Laser Modes in Frequency Domain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  13. Caveolin1: its roles in normal and cancer stem cells.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
  14. Orchestration of Force Generation and Nuclear Collapse in Apoptotic Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Néjma BelaadiInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, UMR 1087, l'institut du thorax, CNRS, UMR 6291, Université de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France. nejma.belaadi@univ-nantes.fr.
Julien AureilleInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, UMR 1209, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, CNRS UMR 5309, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38041 Grenoble, France. julien.aureille@inserm.fr.
Christophe GuilluyInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, UMR 1209, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, CNRS UMR 5309, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38041 Grenoble, France. christophe.guilluy@inserm.fr.

Funding

European Research Council 639300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells are constantly adjusting to the mechanical properties of their surroundings, operating a complex mechanochemical feedback, which hinges on mechanotransduction mechanisms. Whereas adhesion structures have been shown to play a central role in mechanotransduction, it now emerges that the nucleus may act as a mechanosensitive structure. Here, we review recent advances demonstrating that mechanical stress emanating from the cytoskeleton can activate pathways in the nucleus which eventually impact both its structure and the transcriptional machinery.

Indexed as

laminlaminaLINCmechanical stressmechanotransductionnucleoskeletonnucleus

Identifiers

PMID27314389
PMCPMC4931676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.