Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27314297›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2016

Prognostic value of pre-operative serum uric acid levels in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who undergo R0 esophagectomy.

You-Fang Chen, Qiang Li, Dong-Tai Chen, Jia-Hao Pan, Yong-Hua Chen, Zhe-Sheng Wen, Wei-An Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

You-Fang ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qiang LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dong-Tai ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jia-Hao PanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yong-Hua ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhe-Sheng WenDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Wei-An ZengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe serum uric acid (SUA) is the end-product from the metabolic breakdown of purine nucleotides. It has been considered to be a prognostic factor for malignant tumor in several researches. However, its prognostic value in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been elucidated.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 209 ESCC patients who underwent R0 esophagectomy. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value for pre-operative SUA levels and to divide the ESCC patients into two groups. Furthermore, we analyzed the pre-operative serum uric acid (SUA) levels and its relationship with the clinicopathological parameters and the prognosis of 209 ESCC patients.

resultsOptimal cut-off value for pre-operative SUA in ROC analysis was 304.5 μ mol/l (sensitivity 67.46%, specificity 65.06%). SUA low- or high-levels were associated with gender (P< 0.001), smoking status (P< 0.001), pN statues (P= 0.003) and TNM stage (P= 0.010). SUA levels, tumor differentiation and pTNM stage were independent predictors of ESCC patient survival in a multivariate analysis.

conclusionsThe pre-operative level of SUA is an independent prognostic predictor in ESCC patients who undergo R0 esophagectomy and patients with higher SUA level may have an unfavorable survival probability.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagectomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPreoperative PeriodBiomarkers, TumorUric Aciddisease-free survivalEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaoverall survivalprognostic factorSUA

Identifiers

PMID27314297
PMCPMC13020472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.