Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27313902›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2016

Hemispatial Neglect Shows That "Before" Is "Left".

Mario Bonato, Arnaud Saj, Patrik Vuilleumier

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06823193 (How Self-processing Affects Mental Time Travel), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06823193 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

How Self-processing Affects Mental Time Travel: a Neuropsychological Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpARan2024 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsBrain Injuries, FocalArmsMental Time Travel task, Age Estimation control task, Lifeline task
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mario BonatoDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2004-9341
Arnaud SajDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Neuropsychological Unit, University Hospital of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Neurosciences, Laboratory of Neurology and Imaging Cognition, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Patrik VuilleumierDepartment of Neurosciences, Laboratory of Neurology and Imaging Cognition, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has led to the hypothesis that events which unfold in time might be spatially represented in a left-to-right fashion, resembling writing direction. Here we studied fourteen right-hemisphere damaged patients, with or without neglect, a disorder of spatial awareness affecting contralesional (here left) space processing and representation. We reasoned that if the processing of time-ordered events is spatial in nature, it should be impaired in the presence of neglect and spared in its absence. Patients categorized events of a story as occurring before or after a central event, which acted as a temporal reference. An asymmetric distance effect emerged in neglect patients, with slower responses to events that took place before the temporal reference. The event occurring immediately before the reference elicited particularly slow responses, closely mirroring the pattern found in neglect patients performing numerical comparison tasks. Moreover, the first item elicited significantly slower responses than the last one, suggesting a preference for a left-to-right scanning/representation of events in time. Patients without neglect showed a regular and symmetric distance effect. These findings further suggest that the representation of events order is spatial in nature and provide compelling evidence that ordinality is similarly represented within temporal and numerical domains.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttentionBrainFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementNeuropsychological TestsPerceptual DisordersSpace PerceptionVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID27313902
PMCPMC4903131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.