Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27313864›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2016

Renal replacement therapy neutralizes elevated MIF levels in septic shock.

Julia Pohl, Maria Papathanasiou, Martin Heisler, Pia Stock, Malte Kelm, Ulrike B Hendgen-Cotta, Tienush Rassaf, Peter Luedike

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia PohlWest-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Department ofVascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Maria PapathanasiouWest-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Department ofVascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Martin HeislerWest-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Department ofVascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Pia StockWest-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Department ofVascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Malte KelmMedical Faculty, Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ulrike B Hendgen-CottaWest-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Department ofVascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Tienush RassafWest-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Department ofVascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Peter LuedikeWest-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Department ofVascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMacrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is known to amplify the immune response in septic animal models. Few clinical data support this pro-inflammatory role in septic patients. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) as adjuvants in the complex therapy of sepsis has been proposed as a possible approach to eliminate elevated circulating cytokines. Since recent data suggest that MIF can be effectively removed from the circulating blood pool in patients with chronic kidney disease, we here aimed to investigate whether RRT in septic shock can lower plasma levels of this pro-inflammatory cytokine in septic shock patients.

methodsAn observational single-center study on an internist intensive care unit (ICU) was conducted. MIF plasma levels and mortality of n = 25 patients with septic shock were assessed with a previously validated method for reliable MIF values. The effect of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on daily MIF levels and mortality was assessed by comparing patients with and without need for CRRT due to acute kidney injury (AKI).

resultsMIF plasma levels in patients undergoing CRRT due to septic AKI were steadily decreased compared to those from patients without CRRT hinting at a MIF removal by hemodialysis. MIF release during ICU stay as assessed by MIFAUC was lower in patients undergoing CRRT, and Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a distinctly lower mortality in patients undergoing CRRT. Analysis of daily MIF levels showed that patients who did not survive septic shock exhibited steadily higher MIF plasma levels and higher MIFAUC compared to those surviving sepsis. Low MIF levels were closely associated with improved survival.

conclusionsThis is the first study investigating the effect of efficient MIF removal from the plasma pool of patients with septic shock. Reduction of high circulating MIF by CRRT therapy was accompanied by improved survival. Thus, targeted removal of MIF from the circulating blood pool might be a promising approach to reduce mortality in severe sepsis.

Indexed as

HemodialysisICUMIFSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID27313864
PMCPMC4910205
OpenAlexW2441935552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.