Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27313725›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2016

Identification of high-risk patients by human epididymis protein 4 levels during follow-up of ovarian cancer.

Karina Dahl Steffensen, Marianne Waldstrøm, Ivan Brandslund, Bente Lund, Sarah Mejer Sørensen, Max Petzold, Anders Jakobsen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karina Dahl SteffensenDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark.
Marianne WaldstrømDepartment of Pathology, Vejle Hospital, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark.
Ivan BrandslundDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Vejle Hospital, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark.
Bente LundDepartment of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9100 Aalborg, Denmark.
Sarah Mejer SørensenFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Max PetzoldCentre for Applied Biostatistics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, S-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anders JakobsenDepartment of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark.
Vejle Sygehus · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of ovarian cancer patients with advanced disease at diagnosis will relapse following primary treatment, with a dismal prognosis. Monitoring the levels of serum markers in patients under follow-up may be essential for the early detection of relapse, and for distinguishing high-risk patients from those with less aggressive disease. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible predictive value of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) in relation to recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer by measuring the two markers during follow-up subsequent to surgery and adjuvant first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy. Serum HE4 and CA125 were analyzed in 88 epithelial ovarian cancer patients at the end of treatment and consecutively during follow-up. The patients were divided into a high-risk and a low-risk group based on having an increase in HE4 and CA125 levels above or below 50% during follow-up, relative to the baseline (end-of-treatment) level. Disease recurrence was detected in 55 patients during follow-up. Patients with an increase in HE4 of >50% at 3- and 6-month follow-up compared to the end-of-treatment sample had significantly poorer progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR), 2.82 (95% CI, 0.91-8.79; P=0.0052) and HR, 7.71 (95% CI, 3.03-19.58; P<0.0001), respectively]. The corresponding 3- and 6-month biomarker assessments for increased CA125 levels (>50%) showed HRs of 1.86 (95% CI, 0.90-3.80; P=0.0512) and 2.55 (95% CI, 1.39-4.68; P=0.0011), respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed HE4 as a predictor of short PFS, with an HR of 8.23 (95% CI, 3.28-20.9; P<0.0001) at 6-month follow-up. The increase of CA125 was not a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis for PFS. In conclusion, HE4 appears to be a sensitive marker of recurrence and instrumental in risk assessment during the first 6 months of follow-up.

Indexed as

biomarkercarbohydrate antigen 125follow-uphuman epididymis protein 4ovarian cancerrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID27313725
PMCPMC4888273
OpenAlexW2345804409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.