Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27313582›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Osmolality and Non-Structural Carbohydrate Composition in the Secondary Phloem of Trees across a Latitudinal Gradient in Europe.

Anna Lintunen, Teemu Paljakka, Tuula Jyske, Mikko Peltoniemi, Frank Sterck, Georg von Arx, Hervé Cochard, Paul Copini, Maria C Caldeira, Sylvain Delzon and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Elevated COJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Anna LintunenDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland.
Teemu PaljakkaDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland.
Tuula JyskeNatural Resources Institute Finland Vantaa, Finland.
Mikko PeltoniemiNatural Resources Institute Finland Vantaa, Finland.
Frank SterckForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University Wageningen, Netherlands.
Georg von ArxSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Hervé CochardINRA, UMR 547 PIAF, Université Clermont Auvergne Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Paul CopiniForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen UniversityWageningen, Netherlands; Alterra, Wageningen University and Research CentreWageningen, Netherlands.
Maria C CaldeiraForest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon Lisbon, Portugal.
Sylvain DelzonINRA, University of Bordeaux, UMR BIOGECO Talence, France.
Roman GebauerDepartment of Forest, Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocenology, Mendel University in Brno Brno, Czech Republic.
Leila GrönlundDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland.
Natasa KiorapostolouForest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University Wageningen, Netherlands.
Silvia LechthalerDepartment Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali, Legnaro (PD), Università degli Studi di Padova Padova, Italy.
Raquel Lobo-do-ValeForest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon Lisbon, Portugal.
Richard L PetersSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Giai PetitDepartment Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali, Legnaro (PD), Università degli Studi di Padova Padova, Italy.
Angela L PrendinDepartment Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali, Legnaro (PD), Università degli Studi di Padova Padova, Italy.
Yann SalmonDepartment of Physics, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland.
Kathy SteppeLaboratory of Plant Ecology, Department of Applied Ecology and Environmental Biology, Ghent University Gent, Belgium.
Josef UrbanDepartment of Forest, Botany, Dendrology and Geobiocenology, Mendel University in Brno Brno, Czech Republic.
Sílvia Roig JuanNatural Resources Institute Finland Vantaa, Finland.
Elisabeth M R RobertCentre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF)Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain; Laboratory of Plant Biology and Nature Management (APNA), Vrije Universiteit BrusselBrussels, Belgium; Laboratory of Wood Biology and Xylarium, Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA)Tervuren, Belgium.
Teemu HölttäDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland.
Natural Resources Institute Finland · FIUniversity of Padua · ITWageningen University & Research · NLForest Research · GBMendel University in Brno · CZSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research · CHHelsinki Institute of Physics · FIHUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research · HUPhysique et Physiologie Intégratives de l'Arbre en Environnement Fluctuant · FRUMR BIOdiversity, GEnes & Communities · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phloem osmolality and its components are involved in basic cell metabolism, cell growth, and in various physiological processes including the ability of living cells to withstand drought and frost. Osmolality and sugar composition responses to environmental stresses have been extensively studied for leaves, but less for the secondary phloem of plant stems and branches. Leaf osmotic concentration and the share of pinitol and raffinose among soluble sugars increase with increasing drought or cold stress, and osmotic concentration is adjusted with osmoregulation. We hypothesize that similar responses occur in the secondary phloem of branches. We collected living bark samples from branches of adult Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula and Populus tremula trees across Europe, from boreal Northern Finland to Mediterranean Portugal. In all studied species, the observed variation in phloem osmolality was mainly driven by variation in phloem water content, while tissue solute content was rather constant across regions. Osmoregulation, in which osmolality is controlled by variable tissue solute content, was stronger for Betula and Populus in comparison to the evergreen conifers. Osmolality was lowest in mid-latitude region, and from there increased by 37% toward northern Europe and 38% toward southern Europe due to low phloem water content in these regions. The ratio of raffinose to all soluble sugars was negligible at mid-latitudes and increased toward north and south, reflecting its role in cold and drought tolerance. For pinitol, another sugar known for contributing to stress tolerance, no such latitudinal pattern was observed. The proportion of sucrose was remarkably low and that of hexoses (i.e., glucose and fructose) high at mid-latitudes. The ratio of starch to all non-structural carbohydrates increased toward the northern latitudes in agreement with the build-up of osmotically inactive C reservoir that can be converted into soluble sugars during winter acclimation in these cold regions. Present results for the secondary phloem of trees suggest that adjustment with tissue water content plays an important role in osmolality dynamics. Furthermore, trees acclimated to dry and cold climate showed high phloem osmolality and raffinose proportion.

Indexed as

hexoseosmotic concentrationphloem water contentpinitolraffinosestarchsucrose

Identifiers

PMID27313582
PMCPMC4887491
OpenAlexW2412244190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.