ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016
Free Will and Neuroscience: From Explaining Freedom Away to New Ways of Operationalizing and Measuring It.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Moderating Role of Willpower as a Personality Trait in the Relationship Between Social Influence and Moral Disengagement Contradiction.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Representationalism can connect neuroscience and philosophy.Frontiers in cognition · 2025Review
- The collapse of the wave function as the mediator of free will in prime neurons.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Free Will as Defined by the Constrained Disorder Principle: a Restricted, Mandatory, Personalized, Regulated Process for Decision-Making.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2024Review
- The Constrained Disorder Principle May Account for Consciousness.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- A systematic approach to brain dynamics: cognitive evolution theory of consciousness.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Neural bases of freedom and responsibility.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023Review
- Studying brains what could neurometaphysics be to NeurotechEU?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Brainwashing by Social Media: A Threat to Freedom, a Risk for Dictatorship.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2022Article
- Free will and neurosurgical resections of the supplementary motor area: a critical review.Acta neurochirurgica · 2021Review
- Multifaceted aspects of charge transfer.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020Article
- Article
- The Practice of Experimental Psychology: An Inevitably Postmodern Endeavor.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Review
- Neurocognitive free will.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Review
- A Copernican Approach to Brain Advancement: The Paradigm of Allostatic Orchestration.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Why Cognitive Sciences Do Not Prove That Free Will Is an Epiphenomenon.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- TheFrontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Mental Insanity Assessment of Pedophilia: The Importance of the Trans-Disciplinary Approach. Reflections on Two Cases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- A roadmap for the study of conscious audition and its neural basis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of free will is hard to define, but crucial to both individual and social life. For centuries people have wondered how freedom is possible in a world ruled by physical determinism; however, reflections on free will have been confined to philosophy until half a century ago, when the topic was also addressed by neuroscience. The first relevant, and now well-known, strand of research on the brain correlates of free will was that pioneered by Libet et al. (1983), which focused on the allegedly unconscious intentions taking place in decisions regarded as free and voluntary. Libet's interpretation of the so-called readiness potential (RP) seems to favor a sort of deflation of freedom (Soon et al., 2008). However, recent studies seem to point to a different interpretation of the RP, namely that the apparent build-up of the brain activity preceding subjectively spontaneous voluntary movements (SVM) may reflect the ebb and flow of the background neuronal noise, which is triggered by many factors (Schurger et al., 2016). This interpretation seems to bridge the gap between the neuroscientific perspective on free will and the intuitive, commonsensical view of it (Roskies, 2010b), but many problems remain to be solved and other theoretical paths can be hypothesized. The article therefore, proposes to start from an operationalizable concept of free will (Lavazza and Inglese, 2015) to find a connection between higher order descriptions (useful for practical life) and neural bases. This new way to conceptualize free will should be linked to the idea of "capacity": that is, the availability of a repertoire of general skills that can be manifested and used without moment by moment conscious control. The capacity index, which is also able to take into account the differences of time scales in decisions, includes reasons-responsiveness and is related to internal control, understood as the agent's ownership of the mechanisms that trigger the relevant behavior. Cognitive abilities, needed for one to have capacity, might be firstly operationalized as a set of neuropsychological tests, which can be used to operationalize and measure specific executive functions, as they are strongly linked to the concept of control. Subsequently, a free will index would allow for the search of the underlying neural correlates of the capacity exhibited by people and the limits in capacity exhibited by each individual.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.